Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-structured instruction skill: it gives a concrete ledger/checklist workflow, a verdict ladder, provenance format, and self-checking via a pressure test and common-mistakes table, with no redundant concept explanations. It exemplifies token-efficient, actionable guidance.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence—it does not explain what a paper, blog, or benchmark is, and every section (ledger, five-question checklist, verdict ladder, provenance format) earns its place, matching the 'lean and efficient' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable instruction: a five-question checklist, a four-rung verdict ladder with explicit definitions, a one-line provenance template, and a ledger table schema. It is instruction-only but the guidance is specific and copy-ready, which the rubric rewards. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The process is clearly sequenced (list claims → five-question audit → assign verdict → emit provenance) and includes a Pressure Test validation checkpoint plus a Common Mistakes feedback loop, matching the 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a simple single-file skill with well-organized sections and no nested or multi-level references; per the rubric's simple_skills note, that structure can score 3 without external file references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |