Side-by-side comparison of two contract versions or two different contracts with change tracking, favorability analysis, and risk assessment
57
66%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
High
Do not use without reviewing
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./skills/legal-compare/SKILL.mdSecurity
1 high severity finding. You should review these findings carefully before considering using this skill.
The skill handles credentials insecurely by requiring the agent to include secret values verbatim in its generated output. This exposes credentials in the agent’s context and conversation history, creating a risk of data exfiltration.
This skill requires quoting exact text from input documents into the generated CONTRACT-COMPARISON.md (including exact clause text), so any secrets present in the inputs (API keys, tokens, passwords) would be reproduced verbatim and exposed.
Low
Low-risk findings.
1 low severity finding. Worth noting, but not necessarily harmful.
The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.
SKILL.md’s runtime workflow explicitly reads both documents from arbitrary user-supplied inputs (file paths, URLs via WebFetch, or pasted contract text) in Step 1, so outsider-authored free text can be ingested directly.
19ece98
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.