CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

spec-driven-devlopment/spec-as-source

Spec-driven development on OpenSpec, with mechanical spec-as-source enforcement: a custom 'spec-as-source' OpenSpec schema adds file-ownership (targets) and test-verification ([@test]) metadata to every capability spec, three scripts (link check, ownership check, manifest build) keep code and specs from drifting apart, plus requirement-gathering, spec-writer, work-review, and a session-handoff skill with a proactive context-warning hook.

71

Quality

89%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Advisory

Suggest reviewing before use

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

SKILL.mdskills/openspec-propose/

name:
openspec-propose
description:
Propose a new change with all artifacts generated in one step. Use when the user wants to quickly describe what they want to build and get a complete proposal with design, specs, and tasks ready for implementation.
license:
MIT
compatibility:
Requires openspec CLI.
metadata:
{"author":"openspec","version":"1.0","generatedBy":"1.4.1"}

Propose a new change - create the change and generate all artifacts in one step.

I'll create a change with artifacts:

  • proposal.md (what & why)
  • design.md (how)
  • tasks.md (implementation steps)

When ready to implement, run /opsx:apply


Store selection: If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run openspec store list --json to discover registered store ids, then pass --store <id> on the commands that read or write specs and changes (new change, status, instructions, list, show, validate, archive, doctor, context). Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local openspec/ root.

Input: The user's request should include a change name (kebab-case) OR a description of what they want to build.

Steps

  1. If no clear input provided, ask what they want to build

    Ask the user, open-ended (no preset options):

    "What change do you want to work on? Describe what you want to build or fix."

    From their description, derive a kebab-case name (e.g., "add user authentication" → add-user-auth).

    IMPORTANT: Do NOT proceed without understanding what the user wants to build.

  2. Create the change directory

    openspec new change "<name>"

    This creates a scaffolded change in the planning home resolved by the CLI with .openspec.yaml.

  3. Get the artifact build order

    openspec status --change "<name>" --json

    Parse the JSON to get:

    • applyRequires: array of artifact IDs needed before implementation (e.g., ["tasks"])
    • artifacts: list of all artifacts with their status and dependencies
    • planningHome, changeRoot, artifactPaths, and actionContext: path and scope context. Use these instead of assuming repo-local paths.
  4. Create artifacts in sequence until apply-ready

    Track progress through the artifacts with a todo list (or your environment's equivalent progress-tracking mechanism).

    Loop through artifacts in dependency order (artifacts with no pending dependencies first):

    a. For each artifact that is ready (dependencies satisfied):

    • Get instructions:
      openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json
    • The instructions JSON includes:
      • context: Project background (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)
      • rules: Artifact-specific rules (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)
      • template: The structure to use for your output file
      • instruction: Schema-specific guidance for this artifact type
      • resolvedOutputPath: Resolved path or pattern to write the artifact
      • dependencies: Completed artifacts to read for context
    • Read any completed dependency files for context
    • Create the artifact file using template as the structure and write it to resolvedOutputPath
    • Apply context and rules as constraints - but do NOT copy them into the file
    • Show brief progress: "Created "

    b. Continue until all applyRequires artifacts are complete

    • After creating each artifact, re-run openspec status --change "<name>" --json
    • Check if every artifact ID in applyRequires has status: "done" in the artifacts array
    • Stop when all applyRequires artifacts are done

    c. If an artifact requires user input (unclear context):

    • Ask the user to clarify
    • Then continue with creation
  5. Show final status

    openspec status --change "<name>"

Output

After completing all artifacts, summarize:

  • Change name and location
  • List of artifacts created with brief descriptions
  • What's ready: "All artifacts created! Ready for implementation."
  • Prompt: "Run /opsx:apply or ask me to implement to start working on the tasks."

Artifact Creation Guidelines

  • Follow the instruction field from openspec instructions for each artifact type
  • The schema defines what each artifact should contain - follow it
  • Read dependency artifacts for context before creating new ones
  • Use template as the structure for your output file - fill in its sections
  • IMPORTANT: context and rules are constraints for YOU, not content for the file
    • Do NOT copy <context>, <rules>, <project_context> blocks into the artifact
    • These guide what you write, but should never appear in the output

Guardrails

  • Create ALL artifacts needed for implementation (as defined by schema's apply.requires)
  • Always read dependency artifacts before creating a new one
  • If context is critically unclear, ask the user - but prefer making reasonable decisions to keep momentum
  • If a change with that name already exists, ask if user wants to continue it or create a new one
  • Verify each artifact file exists after writing before proceeding to next

skills

openspec-propose

README.md

tile.json