Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a strong, well-structured skill that provides clear, actionable guidance for a specific decision-making process. The workflow is well-sequenced with anti-anchoring mechanisms and bias guardrails that serve as validation checkpoints. Minor weaknesses include some verbosity in peripheral sections and the example being descriptive rather than showing a complete concrete output.
Suggestions
Consider showing a complete filled-in example of the verdict output format rather than just describing the 'likely council shape' — this would make the example section more actionable and serve as a concrete reference.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is mostly efficient and well-structured, but some sections could be tightened. The 'When NOT to Use' table, anti-patterns list, and related skills section add useful value, but the persistence rule section and multi-round follow-up could be more compact. The example at the end describes likely behavior rather than showing concrete output. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides a concrete prompt template for subagents, a specific output format for the verdict, explicit synthesis rules (bias guardrails), and clear role definitions. The workflow steps are specific and executable — Claude knows exactly what to do at each stage. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The six-step workflow is clearly sequenced with explicit ordering rationale (form Architect position before reading other voices to prevent anchoring). Steps include validation-like checkpoints: clarify before convening, synthesis bias guardrails, and the premise check in the verdict. The feedback loop for multi-round follow-up is also addressed. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is well-organized with clear sections and tables, but everything is inline in a single file. At ~150 lines, some content (like the detailed prompt template or the full verdict format) could potentially be split out. The related skills section provides good cross-references but the skill itself is somewhat long for a single file. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |