Conciseness

The body is lean and imperative throughout with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows — the merge-commit heuristic ("Merge commits mean work arrives through pull requests") is task-specific inference guidance, not a git tutorial, and the Plain-words table maps Tessl jargon rather than explaining generic concepts. Every step carries a concrete instruction, matching anchor 5.

Actionability

Guidance is fully executable: concrete commands with expected JSON fields (`tessl project repair --json` → `linkedProject.workspaceName`, `tessl org list --json` → `credits.state`, `gh api repos/<owner>/<repo>/rules/branches/<default branch>`), an exact branch name (`setup-tessl-factory`), and exact questions to ask the user ("Do you want to go ahead?", "Is this what you want?"). This matches the copy-paste-ready anchor 5.

Workflow Clarity

The nine numbered steps are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints and error-recovery branches at each preflight item ("If it fails, ask the user to run `tessl login`"). Consent gates ("Stop if they say no", "Change nothing without asking") and the `tessl doctor --automations` fix-what-it-reports loop provide the feedback loops anchor 5 requires for a state-changing workflow.

Progressive Disclosure

Structure is good: the body stays at overview altitude, starters/customize/testing are well-signaled at their point of need, and detailed content (the 148-line triggers reference) is correctly externalized. However, the core payload `triggers.md` (and `linear.md`) is reachable only via a second hop through `starters.md`, while the rubric wants references one level deep from SKILL.md — a minor organization gap that fits anchor 4 rather than 5.

Specificity

The description names the domain and lists multiple concrete actions: "Set up, explain, or change a Tessl factory" plus five concrete example jobs ("triaging new tickets, shipping tickets as pull requests, keeping pull requests moving, reviewing code, or running a job on a schedule"). Coverage is comprehensive for the domain with no minor gaps that would justify a 4.

Completeness

It explicitly answers both questions: the "what" is the concrete action list, and the "when" is an explicit "Use when someone wants Tessl agents to do work in their repo, asks what a factory is or what theirs does, or wants to add to, change, or customize it" with concrete trigger phrases — matching anchor 5, not 4 where the "when" could be more explicit.

Trigger Term Quality

Natural user phrases are comprehensively covered: "wants Tessl agents to do work in their repo, asks what a factory is or what theirs does, or wants to add to, change, or customize it" — including synonyms (add to / change / customize) and the concrete job terms users would say (triage, ship tickets, review). It clearly exceeds anchor 4, which allows missing natural terms.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"Tessl factory" is a clear branded niche and every trigger condition mentions Tessl or factory, so the risk of firing for a generic PR-review or automation skill is minimal — a clear fit for anchor 5.