Closing the intent-to-code chasm - specification-driven development with BDD verification chain
Overall
score
96%
Does it follow best practices?
Validation for skill structure
Content belongs in specific artifacts. Violations indicate content placed in the wrong phase.
Technology-specific content — these belong in /iikit-03-plan:
Auto-fix: Generalize to technology-agnostic statements.
Implementation details — these belong in /iikit-03-plan:
Allowed: Domain concepts (authentication, encryption), user-facing features, data concepts, performance requirements stated as user outcomes.
Auto-fix: Rewrite as user-facing requirements.
Governance content — these belong in /iikit-00-constitution:
Auto-fix: Replace with constitution references.
Scan draft for violations. If found: list each violation, explain which artifact owns that content, auto-fix, re-validate until clean.
Install with Tessl CLI
npx tessl i tessl-labs/intent-integrity-kit@2.3.5rules
skills
iikit-00-constitution
scripts
iikit-01-specify
iikit-02-clarify
iikit-03-plan
iikit-04-checklist
scripts
dashboard
iikit-05-testify
iikit-06-tasks
iikit-07-analyze
iikit-08-implement
iikit-09-taskstoissues
iikit-bugfix
scripts
iikit-core
scripts
bash
dashboard
powershell