Closing the intent-to-code chasm - specification-driven development with BDD verification chain
Overall
score
96%
Does it follow best practices?
Validation for skill structure
Input: Design documents from /specs/[###-feature-name]/
Prerequisites: plan.md (required), spec.md (required for user stories), research.md, data-model.md, contracts/
Tests: The examples below include test tasks. Tests are OPTIONAL - only include them if explicitly requested in the feature specification.
Organization: Tasks are grouped by user story to enable independent implementation and testing of each story.
[ID] [P?] [Story] Description[TS-005, TS-006, TS-007]), never prose ranges like "TS-005 through TS-007"src/, tests/ at repository rootbackend/src/, frontend/src/api/src/, ios/src/ or android/src/Purpose: Project initialization and basic structure
Purpose: Core infrastructure that MUST be complete before ANY user story can be implemented
CRITICAL: No user story work can begin until this phase is complete
Checkpoint: Foundation ready - user story implementation can now begin in parallel
Goal: [Brief description of what this story delivers]
Independent Test: [How to verify this story works on its own]
NOTE: Write these tests FIRST, ensure they FAIL before implementation
Checkpoint: At this point, User Story 1 should be fully functional and testable independently
Purpose: Improvements that affect multiple user stories
Install with Tessl CLI
npx tessl i tessl-labs/intent-integrity-kitrules
skills
iikit-00-constitution
scripts
iikit-01-specify
iikit-02-clarify
iikit-03-plan
iikit-04-checklist
scripts
dashboard
iikit-05-testify
iikit-06-tasks
iikit-07-analyze
iikit-08-implement
iikit-09-taskstoissues
iikit-bugfix
scripts
iikit-core
scripts
bash
dashboard
powershell