Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a strong, well-structured skill that provides actionable guidance for implementing separation of concerns in web APIs. The executable code examples, clear BAD/GOOD comparisons, and comprehensive checklist make it highly actionable. Minor verbosity in explanatory sections prevents a perfect conciseness score, but the content earns its place overall.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is comprehensive but somewhat verbose. The table format is efficient, but some patterns repeat similar concepts (e.g., the 'BAD/GOOD' examples could be tighter). The explanatory text like 'Why this matters' adds value but could be condensed. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Excellent executable code examples throughout. Every pattern includes complete, copy-paste ready TypeScript code with clear BAD/GOOD comparisons. The error handling, repository, and dependency injection patterns are fully implementable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear three-layer architecture with explicit responsibilities table. The validation pattern explicitly shows two-level validation flow. The checklist at the end provides verification steps. Error mapping workflow is clearly sequenced with re-throw guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-structured with clear sections progressing from architecture overview to specific patterns to file organization to checklist. References to verifiers at the end provide one-level-deep navigation. Content is appropriately organized without being monolithic. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |