Implements Tessl skill review GitHub Actions workflows in your repository through an interactive, configuration-first wizard.
93
Does it follow best practices?
Validation for skill structure
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a well-crafted description that excels across all dimensions. It opens with an explicit 'Use when...' clause containing natural trigger terms, lists specific concrete actions, and clearly distinguishes itself through Tessl-specific terminology and the two-workflow architecture distinction. The description is concise yet comprehensive.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'setting up automated skill review workflows', 'configuring GitHub Actions', 'adding PR checks', 'implementing CI/CD pipelines', 'migrating between workflow architectures'. Also specifies two distinct repository patterns with security isolation. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Explicitly answers both what (setting up workflows, configuring Actions, adding PR checks, implementing pipelines) and when with a clear 'Use when...' clause at the start. Also clarifies scope with the two repository pattern types. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Excellent coverage of natural terms users would say: 'GitHub Actions', 'PR checks', 'CI/CD pipelines', 'skill scoring', 'quality gates', 'workflow', 'automated', 'security isolation'. These are terms developers naturally use when discussing these topics. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly distinctive with specific niche: 'Tessl skill scoring', 'skill review workflows', and the internal vs public repository distinction. Unlikely to conflict with generic CI/CD or GitHub Actions skills due to the Tessl-specific focus. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured, highly actionable skill for setting up GitHub Actions workflows. It excels at workflow clarity with explicit phases, validation steps, and user confirmations throughout. The progressive disclosure is excellent with appropriate external references. Minor verbosity in explanatory sections prevents a perfect conciseness score.
Suggestions
Tighten the 'Workflow Architecture Options' section - Claude doesn't need the detailed explanations of what 'trusted contributors' means
Consolidate the repeated confirmation prompts into a single pattern reference rather than spelling out each one
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is moderately efficient but includes some unnecessary verbosity, particularly in the phase descriptions and option explanations. Some sections like 'Safety Notes' and repeated confirmation prompts could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable bash commands, specific file paths, concrete git operations, and copy-paste ready code blocks. The template substitution logic and detection patterns are specific and actionable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Excellent multi-step workflow with clear phases (Validation, Configuration, Execution), explicit validation checkpoints, confirmation prompts at each step, backup creation before updates, and clear error recovery paths. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-structured with clear overview, phases broken into numbered steps, and appropriate references to external files (single-workflow.md, two-workflow.md, TESTING.md) for detailed templates and testing instructions. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
Install with Tessl CLI
npx tessl i tessl-leo/tessl-workflow-installerReviewed
Table of Contents