Install Tessl Code Review into a GitHub repository. Inspects the repository's existing workflows and any Code Review caller already present, asks the two setup questions (when reviews run, and whether findings block the merge), then writes or updates a thin caller workflow that invokes the Tessl Code Review Action. Use when someone wants to add, set up, enable, configure, update, or remove Tessl Code Review, AI code review, or automated pull-request review in a repository, or asks to switch it between advisory and gate mode.
87
97%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
72%
0.94xAverage score across 5 eval scenarios
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Install Tessl Code Review into a GitHub repository, by writing the thin caller workflow that invokes the supported Tessl Code Review Action.
The supported Action lives at tesslio/code-review-action. An installed caller
workflow names it on its uses: line.
tessl install tessl/code-review-setupThe Action owns getting a review run: pull-request resolution, checkout of the exact head, Tessl CLI setup, the check run it reports on the reviewed head, failure notices, and result artifacts. The Tessl CLI it installs runs the review and publishes it, which is where stale-head protection and idempotent retries live. The repository owns a caller workflow: triggers, concurrency, runner, timeout, permissions, the token secret, and the review policy.
This plugin writes that caller and nothing else. It never copies review or publication logic into the repository, so there is only ever one execution path.
Setup is two questions:
@tessl-code-review mention and never on its own; once when the
pull request becomes ready plus requested rounds (the default); or on every
commit.Gate mode decides whether the check fails, not which findings make it fail. That
is requestChangesAt in a repository YAML profile, and a repository that sets no
threshold requests changes at Major on every round, so a Minor is published as a
suggestion. Setup names the key when gate is chosen rather than asking for a
value, because the default suits almost every repository.
The two are independent choices, and every pairing is installable. The Action
reports its own check, named Tessl Code Review, against the head it reviewed on
every trigger, so a gate holds on any cadence once that check is required in
branch protection. What the cadence decides is when a fresh verdict arrives, and
the skill says plainly that on the non-automatic cadences a blocked pull request
stays blocked until someone asks for a new round.
Around those two answers, the skill inspects the repository first and asks only
for what it cannot infer: existing workflow conventions, an existing Code Review
caller and its pinned revision, conflicting callers, the TESSL_TOKEN secret,
fork traffic, and current branch protection. It proposes the change, waits for
explicit approval, writes idempotently, verifies the result, and then explains the
permissions, the secret, the branch-protection step, and how to update or remove
the setup.
The installed workflow references the Action by its major tag, which moves to each 1.x release, so a fix reaches the repository without anyone editing the file. A repository that wants the revision frozen gets the current release's full commit SHA instead, resolved at setup time rather than invented, and accepts that updates then need a deliberate bump. A branch is never installed for either.
Mention-driven rounds are requested by mentioning @tessl-code-review in a
comment on the pull request. That token belongs to the Action, whose published
review asks reviewers to use it, so the caller matches it rather than inventing a
command of its own. Who may request a round is a choice the skill puts to the
user, defaulting to owners, organization members, and invited collaborators.
A comment can also ask Tessl to approve the pull request rather than review it,
or to review the whole change again rather than the narrower later round. Both
are permitted for owners, members and collaborators, and for any comment author
named in approver-logins, which is the only route open to a GitHub App: an App
comments with author association NONE whatever its permissions, so no
association names one.
| Skill | Description |
|---|---|
setup-code-review | Detect, interview, propose, write, verify, and explain the Code Review caller workflow |
Cadence and blocking are what this plugin sets. What the reviewer looks for is
the profile and lenses inputs, documented in the Action repository's README.
The Action supports the built-in standard profile and explicitly selected
repository YAML profiles.