Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, highly actionable workflow with concrete commands and exact output schemas. It loses a little on conciseness (minor repetition) and workflow clarity (no explicit validate-fix-retry loop).
Suggestions
Trim the repeated 'Important reminders' section, which restates constraints already covered in Steps 2-5, to tighten conciseness toward a 5.
Add an explicit validation/verification checkpoint in Step 5 (e.g., 'Validate results.json against schemas/results.schema.json before finishing; if invalid, fix and re-validate') to close the workflow-clarity feedback-loop gap.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and instructional with exact file paths, formulas, and JSON templates; minor repetition in the closing reminders and a few over-explained asides ('Do not load all bundle file contents into memory') keep it just below the lean anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready guidance: concrete shell operations ('List all .json files in ./rubrics/', 'Read ./config.json'), exact scoring formulas, and complete JSON output templates covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence (Read → Discover → Run judges → Compute → Write) with an implicit validation checkpoint ('results.json must conform to schemas/results.schema.json'), but no explicit error-recovery feedback loop, so it sits below anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Body is organized into well-signaled sections and points to real one-level-deep references (./rubrics/, ./config.json, schemas/results.schema.json, confirmed present in ./references/), with only minor organization gaps versus the ideal anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |