Create custom Tessl reviewer plugins – fork the default rubric, build one from scratch, or derive its rubrics from evidence (existing skills, PR review feedback, agent logs). Scaffolds the plugin directory structure, authors rubrics and config.json, and validates the result with tessl review run.
97
96%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
98%
1.15xAverage score across 6 eval scenarios
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
You are deriving a custom tessl review plugin rubric for a single skill, grounded in
evidence about how agents actually behaved with it. The evidence has already been gathered
for you (the gathering tools that would normally collect it — /find-optimizations and
tessl agent-logs view — are not available in this environment), so work from the files
provided rather than calling those tools.
./inputs/)inputs/target-skill/SKILL.md — the skill the produced plugin will score. This is the baseline.inputs/pr-feedback.md — /find-optimizations output: recurring review findings, each with a
Type, Summary, and Evidence.inputs/agent-log.md — an agent-log excerpt with two sessions.Following the derive-review-rubrics workflow, map the evidence to rubric content and write
a single rubric design file to ./design.md in your working directory. Do not scaffold a
plugin, copy schemas, or run tessl review run — that is create-review-plugin's job, which
happens later. Do not modify any file under ./inputs/.
The design file should describe the judges and their evaluation_targets, the scoring
dimensions with anchors and examples drawn from the evidence, the scope and scoring_notes
for any content judge, and the weight split. It should also record any evidence pattern that
does NOT belong in the rubric and where it should go instead.