Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, executable, and well-structured with platform-specific commands and an explicit stop-condition. The only gap is a lack of explicit retry/validation feedback for the batch ticket-filing step, which keeps workflow clarity just below top marks.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: it gives exact gh/glab commands and classification rules without explaining what CI or a flaky test is, and every line earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It supplies copy-paste-ready commands (e.g. `gh run list --limit 100 --json ...`, `gh run view <id> --log-failed`, `gh issue create ...`) and concrete classification bars covering both GitHub and GitLab, matching the fully-executable anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The three-step sequence is clear with concrete commands and key checkpoints (skip duplicates before filing; stop and say so if nothing crossed the bar), but there is no explicit validate/retry feedback loop for the batch filing step, so it sits below the score-5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a self-contained, well-organized single-file overview with clear section headers and no bundle files to reference; under the simple-skill exception this warrants a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |