The content is well-structured, domain-specific, and actionable, with a clearly sequenced workflow that includes validation and feedback steps plus a deliberate cross-skill reference for API mechanics. It earns its tokens by covering only what Claude would not already know about Tessl Context and Findings.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is efficient and domain-specific, explaining Tessl-only concepts (Context, Findings, gated entitlements) Claude would not already know without padding with generic concepts; minor tightening possible in the Findings-field enumeration.	4 / 5
Actionability	Concrete commands and operations are given throughout (tessl install tessl/api, tessl api, tessl update <workspace/plugin>, tessl skill publish) with specific endpoint-field guidance, though the exact tessl api call syntax for each endpoint is deferred to the tessl/api skill rather than shown inline.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A clear six-step workflow is sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints (scope to workspace, handle gated findings before evidence, re-fetch to confirm), feedback loops for error recovery, and a gated/non-gated branching rule.	5 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Content is well-organized into clear sections (Discovering and calling the API, Workflow, Gated Findings, Remediation by archetype) with a one-level-deep reference to the tessl/api skill for raw API mechanics, but there are no separate bundle files and the archetype table is inlined rather than split out.	4 / 5
	Total	17 / 20 Passed

Description

91%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly and explicitly answers both what the skill does and when to use it, with natural trigger phrases and a distinct niche around Tessl Context and Findings. It is concise, specific, and uses third person throughout.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names several concrete actions (understand Context, address Findings, review/triage/clean up) tied to specific data (Context, Findings), with only minor coverage gaps around how remediation is actually performed.	4 / 5
Completeness	Explicitly states both the 'what' (understand Context and address Findings) and the 'when' with an explicit 'Use whenever' clause plus four concrete trigger phrases.	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Includes natural user phrases as examples ("what does my Context show", "address my Findings", "fix the drift findings", "what untracked skills do I have") plus the trigger terms Context/Findings and concrete archetypes like drift, giving comprehensive keyword coverage.	5 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Occupies a clear niche (Tessl Context/Findings lifecycle) with domain-specific triggers (Findings, drift, untracked skills) unlikely to collide with unrelated skills.	5 / 5
	Total	19 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Reviewed

8 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation