A well-structured, mostly lean skill body that gives concrete commands and a sequenced workflow with a re-fetch validation loop. Weakest in workflow_clarity and actionability where per-step validation and full executable command examples (with arguments) are deferred to the tessl/api dependency.

Suggestions

Add one fully-specified example `tessl api` call (with the status=active and workspaceId filters shown inline) so the core fetch step is copy-paste ready without consulting tessl/api.

Insert a per-remediation validation checkpoint (e.g., re-read the affected skillInstance after `tessl install` / `tessl update` / `tessl skill publish`) rather than relying solely on the final re-fetch.

Tighten the 'Gated Findings' section: it restates the withheld-joins detail already covered in step 3 and the field list above, and could be collapsed to the permitted-metadata and entitlement-unlock guidance only.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	Lean body that explains only Tessl-specific domain (the Context/Findings data model, gating) Claude would not already know, with no generic concept padding; minor trims are possible in the restated Gated Findings section, so it sits at anchor 4 rather than 5.	4 / 5
Actionability	Provides concrete commands ('tessl install tessl/api', 'tessl api ...', 'tessl update <workspace/plugin>', 'tessl skill publish') and specific field references, but full copy-paste commands with arguments are delegated to the tessl/api skill, leaving minor gaps below the anchor-5 bar.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A six-step numbered workflow includes an explicit validation feedback loop at step 6 ('Re-fetch to confirm', a resolved Finding 'leaves the active list'), avoiding the destructive/batch cap of 3; individual remediation actions lack per-step validation, so it does not reach anchor 5.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Self-contained, well-sectioned body (API discovery, Workflow, Gated Findings, Remediation by archetype) with a single clearly signaled one-level reference to the tessl/api plugin dependency; no bundle files exist to verify, and the inline archetype catalog could arguably live in its own file, holding it at anchor 4.	4 / 5
	Total	16 / 20 Passed

Description

83%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description that clearly answers both what the skill does and when to invoke it, with concrete example trigger phrases a user would naturally say. The main limitation is that some capability verbs ('address') remain abstract and the product terms double as generic English words.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain and several concrete actions ('Understand your Context and address its Findings', 'review, triage, or clean up Findings'), but actions like 'address Findings' stay somewhat abstract, short of the comprehensive enumerated verbs at anchor 5.	4 / 5
Completeness	Explicitly states both the 'what' ('Understand your Context and address its Findings for the current repo') and the 'when' ('Use whenever the user asks about their Context, their Findings...') with concrete trigger phrases, matching the anchor-5 example.	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Includes natural user phrases as examples ('what does my Context show', 'fix the drift findings', 'what untracked skills do I have') with good coverage, but lacks the synonym/extension breadth that defines the anchor-5 benchmark.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Targets a specific Tessl-product niche with distinct example triggers, but 'Context' and 'Findings' are generic English words that carry some overlap risk with unrelated skills, keeping it below anchor 5.	4 / 5
	Total	17 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Reviewed

9 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation