Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured, concrete, and highly actionable with clear validation gates, but it over-explains some familiar concepts and inlines content (guardrail catalog, full template) that would benefit from extraction into local reference files.
Suggestions
Trim explanations of concepts Claude already knows (novelty/primacy effects, Simpson's paradox, Bonferroni/BH) to one-line reminders to improve conciseness.
Extract the guardrail threshold catalog and the full sign-off template into a local references/ file (e.g. references/checklist-template.md) and link to it, rather than inlining everything in SKILL.md.
Add explicit error-recovery feedback loops for the highest-stakes gates (e.g., what to do when SRM is detected beyond 'root-cause first') to push workflow clarity toward the top anchor.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with dense tables and concrete thresholds, but it explains concepts Claude already knows (novelty/primacy, Simpson's paradox, multiple-comparison corrections) and includes a fully worked chi-square example plus a long inline sign-off template that pad the token budget. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete and specific throughout — exact SRM threshold (p<0.0001), the chi-square formula with worked numbers, per-class guardrail block thresholds, and a copy-paste checklist template with placeholders. As an instruction/governance skill it lacks executable code, which the rubric permits, leaving only minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 8-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (SRM check, 'stop ship discussion; root-cause first', post-experiment gates table with pass criteria, sign-off form). Feedback loops for error recovery are lighter than the top anchor, which keeps it just below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | There is no local bundle (references/, scripts/, assets/ are absent), so all content — including a full guardrail catalog and a complete sign-off template — is inlined in one ~240-line SKILL.md. Section headers give structure, but content that would naturally live in separate reference files is inline, and the references that do appear point to other skills rather than bundled files. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |