Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable skill body with a clear multi-step workflow, explicit validation, and clean progressive disclosure to a real reference file. Conciseness and actionability are strong but have minor trimmability and self-containment gaps.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient with concrete YAML, code, and a terse score table, and avoids re-explaining basics Claude already knows, but the hand-off bullet list and some inline comments are slightly trimmable, keeping it just below the lean anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides mostly-executable guidance — the generator loop, the score() rubric, and specific compile-check commands (npx tsc --noEmit, python -m py_compile, node --check) — but defers helper functions and input loading to the reference, leaving minor gaps from fully copy-paste-ready. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Seven clearly sequenced steps include an explicit validation checkpoint (compile check with a concrete downgrade rule) and an explicit feedback loop with a lessons-back-into-prompt diagram and a review checklist, matching the anchor for validation plus error-recovery feedback. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The spine keeps minimal runnable cores inline and offloads full versions plus parsing helpers to a single, clearly-signaled, one-level-deep reference (references/generation-and-scoring.md, verified present), with clean sectioning and easy navigation. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |