CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

testland/allure-reports

Configures Allure Report (test-runner adapter install, `allure-results` directory wiring, `categories.json` for failure classification, `history-trend.json` retention via the copy-history-between-runs pattern), runs the Allure CLI to convert `allure-results` to a static HTML site, and uploads the report as a CI artifact. Use when the team needs richer test reporting than JUnit XML - step-level attachments, per-test history, retry tracking, and severity / epic / feature labeling across framework-agnostic adapters (pytest, Jest, JUnit, TestNG, NUnit, Mocha). As a rich static HTML report generator, it is the open-source alternative to extentreports (JVM/.NET per-test HTML narrative); for hosted cross-run flakiness analytics rather than a static per-run report use currents-integration.

73

Quality

92%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

Quality

Content

80%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A strong, highly actionable reference skill with executable code at every step and a clear seven-step sequence. Its main gaps are the absence of explicit verification checkpoints in the workflow and no use of bundle files to offload the longer reference material.

Suggestions

Add explicit validation checkpoints — e.g., after `allure generate`, verify `allure-report/index.html` exists, and add a verify/retry note for the history-copy step (`if [ -d previous-allure-report/history ]`) — to lift workflow clarity and guard the destructive `--clean` flag.

Move the full GitHub Actions workflow and the framework-adapter table into `references/` files (e.g., `references/ci-workflow.yml`, `references/adapters.md`) and keep SKILL.md as an overview that links to them one level deep, improving progressive disclosure.

Add a short 'Verify' subsection to Step 2 / Step 6 confirming the report was generated and the history artifact was uploaded, so failures surface before the next run reuses a missing history slice.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dense and operational — commands, a framework adapter table, JSON/YAML/Python/JS code blocks — and does not explain concepts Claude already knows; quoted doc passages are used to justify specific claims rather than pad. It earns its length for a multi-step skill rather than sitting at the 'could be tightened' level below.

3 / 3

Actionability

Provides copy-paste-ready, executable guidance throughout: `allure generate allure-results --clean -o allure-report`, a complete GitHub Actions workflow YAML, a `categories.json` sample, and per-language metadata snippets with exact package coordinates — matching 'fully executable code/commands; copy-paste ready'.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The seven steps are clearly sequenced and the copy-history routine is ordered, but there are no explicit validation/verification checkpoints (e.g., confirm `allure-report/index.html` exists after generation) and no validate→fix→retry feedback loop; `allure generate --clean` is mildly destructive, which per the guidelines caps this at 2 rather than 3.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Sections are well-organized (Overview, When to use, Steps 1–7, Anti-patterns, Limitations, References) and external links are clearly signaled, but no bundle files exist and all detail — the full CI workflow and the adapter table — lives inline in a ~340-line SKILL.md rather than being split into one-level-deep reference files.

2 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific, third-person, and explicitly pairs a 'what' with a 'Use when' trigger, while proactively distinguishing the skill from adjacent tools. It is somewhat dense but every clause carries discriminative information.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — 'test-runner adapter install', 'allure-results directory wiring', 'categories.json for failure classification', 'history-trend.json retention via the copy-history-between-runs pattern', 'runs the Allure CLI', 'uploads the report as a CI artifact' — matching the 'lists multiple specific concrete actions' anchor.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ('Configures Allure Report ... runs the Allure CLI ... uploads the report as a CI artifact') and when ('Use when the team needs richer test reporting than JUnit XML - ...'), matching the 'clearly answers both what AND when with explicit triggers' anchor; voice is third person throughout.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Covers natural terms a user would say — 'richer test reporting than JUnit XML', 'step-level attachments', 'per-test history', 'retry tracking', 'severity / epic / feature labeling' — plus framework names (pytest, Jest, JUnit, TestNG, NUnit, Mocha), giving good coverage rather than just jargon.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche (Allure Report) and it actively disambiguates from neighbors — 'open-source alternative to extentreports' and 'for hosted cross-run flakiness analytics ... use currents-integration' — making wrong-skill triggering unlikely.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Reviewed

Table of Contents