CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

testland/azure-functions-tests

Runs Azure Functions locally using Azure Functions Core Tools v4 (`func start`), Azurite storage emulation, and framework-native unit tests for handler code (.NET isolated worker model, Node.js v4, Python v2). Covers HTTP, queue, and timer trigger testing, admin-endpoint invocation for non-HTTP triggers, and binding verification via local.settings.json. Use when testing Azure Functions before deployment, reproducing trigger behaviour without live Azure services, or gating function handler logic in CI.

72

Quality

90%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

Low

Low-risk findings.

1 low severity finding. Worth noting, but not necessarily harmful.

Low

W011: Third-party content exposure detected (indirect prompt injection risk).

What this means

The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.

Why it was flagged

The runtime workflow is the local Azure Functions host started with `func start` plus an admin endpoint that accepts POSTed JSON payloads for queue/timer triggers (e.g., `http://localhost:7071/admin/functions/<name>`), meaning outsider-authored request body text can be ingested directly into the functions under test.

Where we found it

localhost:7071

domain · 6 sites

The scanner flags localhost:7071 as an ingestion point for outsider-authored content via the admin endpoint, but this is the user's own local Azure Functions development server receiving user-crafted test payloads.

Report incorrect finding
Audited
Security analysis
Snyk