CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
PluginPublic

testland/browser-matrix-strategy-reference

Use when deciding which browsers, OS versions and devices to test: a three-tier matrix built from traffic data, quarterly re-tier reviews, a published support policy and test budget, or the case for dropping an old browser. The Playwright, Selenium Grid and cloud-grid skills run it.

Quality

89%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

Quality

Content

88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-executed reference skill: concrete thresholds, a validated workflow with explicit checkpoints and feedback loops, and a clean one-level-deep bundle split. The only deductions are minor — some duplicated link listings and a slightly buried tiers reference.

Suggestions

Trim the References section so it does not duplicate the URLs already given in the "Data sources for traffic share" table, keeping only entries not previously listed.

Link references/compatibility-budget-tiers.md from the "Capping the matrix" section (where the tier commitment model is discussed) rather than only from the terminal References list, and correct that section's description of which file carries the tier tables.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Dense, table-driven content that assumes Claude's competence and explains only non-obvious domain material, with minor trimmable redundancy: the References section re-lists URLs already tabulated under "Data sources for traffic share", and there is cross-reference chatter like "The single authoritative traffic thresholds, referenced by the three-tier model and worked example above".

4 / 5

Actionability

Fully actionable for an instruction-only skill: exact thresholds (≥5%, 1-5%, <1%, <0.1%), a rules-based tier-membership heuristic, a cost-tier infrastructure mapping, a BLOCK/WARN review checklist with concrete rules, and a worked example with real numbers. Specific examples cover the common cases, matching the top anchor.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The 8-step "How to use" sequence ends in an explicit validation gate ("assert traffic <0.1% across two independent sources... AND that no statutory or SLA requirement applies; if either check fails, keep the combo in T3 and re-review next quarter") — a validation step with an error-recovery feedback loop — complemented by the review checklist ("Refuse to treat a matrix as PASS while any BLOCK finding stands") and the quarterly re-run loop.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The bundle is well structured: three real reference files, all linked from the body, one level deep, and clearly signaled with their contents (e.g., the budget section enumerates what compatibility-budget.md "carries"). Minor gaps: compatibility-budget-tiers.md is linked only from the terminal References list rather than the budget section that describes its tier tables, and the budget section slightly misattributes where the tier definitions live.

4 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description with an explicit, multi-scenario "Use when" trigger clause and a concrete statement of what the skill delivers. Keyword coverage and action framing have minor room for improvement (e.g., adding "cross-browser testing" / "browser compatibility" synonyms).

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names several concrete deliverables — "a three-tier matrix built from traffic data, quarterly re-tier reviews, a published support policy and test budget, or the case for dropping an old browser" — but they are framed as artifacts rather than a comprehensive set of concrete actions, and the closing sentence about sibling skills adds no capability.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both: "Use when deciding which browsers, OS versions and devices to test..." gives concrete trigger scenarios, and the what is stated as the three-tier matrix, re-tier reviews, support policy, test budget, and drop rationale. Not 4 because the when-clause is explicit and specific rather than merely present.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural phrases like "which browsers, OS versions and devices to test", "traffic data", "support policy", and "dropping an old browser" are present, but common variations such as "cross-browser testing" and "browser compatibility" are missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche (matrix strategy vs. test execution) and explicitly disambiguates from the overlapping sibling skills via "The Playwright, Selenium Grid and cloud-grid skills run it", keeping conflict risk minimal.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

referenced_paths_exist

Referenced path issues: 2 missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Reviewed

On this page