Builds a well-formed bug (defect) report from raw observation notes - fills in summary, environment, steps to reproduce, expected vs actual, and severity rationale - and validates that each field has the load-bearing content reviewers and engineers need to triage. Also converts a single test-failure record (JUnit XML, Allure JSON, pytest log, Playwright report) into a classified, ready-to-file bug spec, and provides the adversarial review checklist that gates a report before it enters the tracker (required fields, single-description title test, severity-priority independence, reproduction quality). Use when a stakeholder reports a problem informally, when a CI failure artefact needs to become a triageable report, or when a drafted report needs a pre-filing quality audit.
81
95%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
80%
0.88xAverage score across 10 eval scenarios
High
Do not use without reviewing
A patient phoned our helpdesk twice this week about downloading a results letter from the patient portal. The agent who took the second call typed up her notes from both conversations afterwards, from memory, in one block.
Inside those notes the patient says several different things about how often it fails and whether it ever worked, and one attempt apparently produced a file that she describes as empty without saying what she means by that. A family member tried on a different machine, though it is not clear she was signed in as the same person.
This portal is regulated and every defect we file gets read at the weekly clinical safety review, where a claim that turns out to have been assumed rather than reported has to be formally retracted. The safety lead has asked for reports that make it obvious which statements came from the patient.
reports/results-letter-download.md for the clinical safety review.Out of scope: contacting the patient, opening the document service, or suggesting a workaround.
Extract the following files before beginning.
=============== FILE: inbox/helpdesk-notes.md =============== Helpdesk notes — Brightpath Health patient portal Written up 2026-08-14 by agent K. Mensah, covering calls on the 11th and 14th (notes reconstructed after the second call, no recording kept)
Patient: female, 60s, calls herself "not very technical". Consented to us logging the issue. Declined a remote session.
What she said, as close as I can remember:
Agent note: I have not tried to reproduce this myself. I don't have a test patient with a results letter attached.