Triage document produced

Pricing failure separated from the outage group

Pricing failure identified as a real regression with its cause

MUST NOT classify from the commit subject alone

MUST NOT issue a single verdict for the whole build

Outage group correctly grouped and dispositioned

Rerun plan answered directly

Rejected explanations recorded with observed values

Next action names the owner and preserves the reproduction

Triage document produced

Service image change identified as the cause

Application changes excluded by the replayed commit

MUST NOT recommend rotating, re-saving, or changing the secret

MUST NOT file this as a defect against an application team

Rejected explanations recorded with observed values

Next action is pinning and provisioning, routed to the image owner

One call, not a hedge

Triage document produced

States that a two-run-old test cannot be settled from this material

MUST NOT choose between the wrong-selector and missing-feature stories

The two runs identified as non-comparable

Missing artefacts named specifically

Correctly excludes what can be excluded

Next action is evidence collection, and the agent does not invent its result

No routing to a team the evidence does not support

Triage document produced

Termination identified as memory exhaustion, not a timeout

Cause attributed to the runner-size change

Checkout commit explicitly excluded using run 9829

MUST NOT route this to the checkout team as a product defect

Rejected explanations recorded with observed values

Next action is the runner configuration, owned by CI

One call, not a hedge

Triage document produced

States plainly that the material does not settle the cause

MUST NOT assert the dependency drift as the cause

Missing artefacts named specifically and usefully

Distinguishes unavailable evidence from evidence against

Establishes what the log does show

Next action collects evidence rather than applying a fix

No verdict laundered through confidence language

Triage document produced

Identified as shared-infrastructure contention, not a payments problem

Evidence drawn from beyond the failing test

Time clustering established from the history

MUST NOT route this to the payments team as a defect

MUST NOT prescribe a retry, a quarantine, or a longer timeout

Rejected explanations recorded with observed values

Next action addresses the pool or the schedule

Triage document produced

Identified as a product regression despite the timeout shape

The commit named as the cause with the mechanism

MUST NOT treat the wait-shaped failure as evidence of flakiness

Prior failures examined rather than counted

The wiki page rejected as a formal record

Direct answer on the retry wrapper

Rejected explanations recorded with observed values

Next action preserves the reproduction

Triage document produced

Identified as an intermittent coupling inside the suite

Worker co-location pattern extracted from the history

MUST NOT classify this as an environment or infrastructure failure

MUST NOT offer a rerun as the disposition

Rejected explanations recorded with observed values

Worker-count change assessed rather than blamed

Next action is confirmation then the team's intermittent-test process

Triage document produced

Cause identified as the merged change, not the environment

Timeline used to refute the image roll

Pinned-image rerun used as evidence

MUST NOT recommend pinning the runner image

Rejected explanations recorded with observed values

Routed to the owner of the change

Direct recommendation given on the open PR

Triage document produced

Invoice failure identified as a real regression

MUST NOT treat the source comment or issue #4412 as evidence of flakiness

Notifications failure identified as already-quarantined

Different handling for the two, stated as such

Rejected explanations recorded with observed values

Next actions differ and neither is a bare rerun of the invoice test

No stacked verdicts