Content
78%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, actionable DAST cadence playbook with clean progressive disclosure into a real CI-workflows reference. The main weaknesses are a stubbed aggregation step and slightly weaker validation feedback loops relative to the rubric's ideal.
Suggestions
Replace the Step 7 aggregation stub with executable code or an explicit pointer to a reference file that contains the real aggregation logic.
Add an explicit validate->fix->retry feedback loop (e.g., re-run baseline diff after a suppression/baseline change and re-check coverage) to strengthen workflow clarity.
Trim motivational framing sentences (e.g., 'if they all block PRs, the team disables DAST') that restate consequences Claude can already infer.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean and table/step-driven with no 'what is DAST' preamble, but a few motivation sentences ('if they all block PRs, the team disables DAST') pad slightly beyond what Claude needs. | 2.5 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides executable pr-gate.py, dedupe_findings, jq coverage commands, and real workflow YAML in the reference; however Step 7 aggregation is a stub ('curl ...' and a '# Aggregate all three + emit unified verdict' comment) rather than executable code. | 2.5 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1-9 are clearly sequenced with cross-references and an end-to-end checklist (Step 9), but explicit validate->fix->retry feedback loops are lighter than the coverage threshold and triage gating suggest. | 2.5 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-signaled one-level-deep reference ('Full workflow YAML for all three: references/ci-workflows.md') to a real bundle file, with bulky YAML appropriately split out and clearly organized sections. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10.5 / 12 Passed |