Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Highly actionable, well-structured content with a complete executable example and a clear gap-flagging workflow; minor room to tighten the overview aside and confirm the long body is appropriately partitioned.
Suggestions
Trim the Overview's terminology-provenance commentary about Andrew Jones / Chad Sanderson, or move it to a one-line footnote, to sharpen conciseness.
Ensure the worked examples referenced in references/examples.md cover the three promised scenarios (PRD to contract, minimal source with gap list, refactor) so the body's example offloading fully pays off.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with well-organized tables and an executable YAML example, but the Overview's practitioner-emergent-terminology commentary ("Andrew Jones / Chad Sanderson") is a minor aside that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a complete, copy-paste-ready YAML contract covering all five sections, per-column field tables, a numbered extraction procedure, and an anti-patterns table with concrete fixes. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear numbered extraction sequence (1-6) with an explicit gap-flagging feedback loop: the agent never fabricates, every gap becomes a question, and the contract is declared incomplete until filled. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear labeled sections with a one-level-deep reference to the real references/examples.md file for worked examples; the body is fairly long but appropriately split rather than monolithic. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |