CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
PluginPublic

testland/dependabot-config

Use when writing or reviewing .github/dependabot.yml for a GitHub repo: required keys, ecosystems, directories and schedules, plus ignore rules, grouped PRs, allow lists, labels, PR limits, target branches, versioning strategy and security-only updates.

Quality

90%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

Quality

Content

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

An excellent reference skill body: actionable copy-paste YAML with exact field values, a clearly sequenced authoring workflow with an explicit verify-and-fix feedback loop, and clean progressive disclosure into a real one-level-deep reference file. The only weakness is mild verbosity — repeated citation boilerplate, a conceptual framing detour in Step 6, and one mangled quote.

Suggestions

Remove the repeated "Per [db-cfg][db-cfg]:" boilerplate before each table/example, citing the official reference once (e.g., in the References section) instead.

Fix the mangled quotation in the ignore section ("optionally using `*` to match zero or\" more characters") so the quoted sentence is intact.

Trim Step 6's framing sentences about the "FP triage analogue" and lead directly with the suppression-mechanisms table and justification template.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dense and efficient — config surface delivered via tables and YAML snippets with no padding about what Dependabot is — but there are trimmable elements: the boilerplate "Per [db-cfg][db-cfg]:" is repeated four times, Step 6 opens with a conceptual framing detour ("Dependabot doesn't produce findings to triage... The 'FP triage' analogue is..."), and the ignore-section quote is mangled mid-sentence ("to match zero or\" more characters"). This matches the 4 anchor (efficient, minor instances that could be trimmed) rather than 5.

4 / 5

Actionability

Guidance is fully executable: copy-paste-ready YAML for the top-level structure, monorepo directories, ignore/groups/allow blocks, and a realistic multi-ecosystem config; exact enumerated values ("npm", "bundler", ... "terraform"; "daily / weekly / monthly / quarterly..."); a concrete ignore justification template; and an exact verification path (Insights -> Dependency graph -> Dependabot, "Check for updates"). This matches the 5 anchor.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Steps 1-7 give a clear authoring sequence (structure -> per-update fields -> optional fields -> realistic example -> security -> triage -> auto-merge) with an explicit validation checkpoint and feedback loop: "**Verify:** after committing .github/dependabot.yml... confirm GitHub reports no dependabot.yml parse error...; if it flags a parse error, fix the reported key and re-push". The missing-validation cap does not apply since validation with error recovery is present, matching the 5 anchor.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The spine keeps the core config surface while advanced material (full multi-ecosystem example, patch-only auto-merge workflow) is split into references/dependabot-advanced.md, which exists in the bundle and is one level deep. It is clearly signaled at each point of need ("Full config...: [references/dependabot-advanced.md]", "Full workflow: [references/dependabot-advanced.md]") and again in the References section, matching the 5 anchor (clear overview, well-signaled one-level-deep references, easy navigation).

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Description

83%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, highly specific description that names the exact artifact and platform and comprehensively enumerates the config surface it covers, with an explicit "Use when" trigger clause. The only gaps are minor: the standalone word "dependabot" and a few natural synonyms are missing, and the "what" is a topic list rather than an explicit capability statement.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description enumerates the concrete config surface — "required keys, ecosystems, directories and schedules, plus ignore rules, grouped PRs, allow lists, labels, PR limits, target branches, versioning strategy and security-only updates" — tied to the concrete artifact ".github/dependabot.yml". This matches the 5 anchor (multiple specific concrete actions, comprehensive coverage); it is not 4 because there are no meaningful coverage gaps in the listed capabilities.

5 / 5

Completeness

The "when" is explicit and specific ("Use when writing or reviewing .github/dependabot.yml for a GitHub repo") so the missing-trigger cap does not apply, and the colon-list scopes the "what". It falls short of the 5 anchor because there is no explicit action clause stating what the skill does (e.g., "Generates/validates..."), only a topic inventory, matching the 4 anchor (both present, one could be more explicit).

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Good natural keywords are present ("dependabot.yml", "GitHub repo", "grouped PRs", "security-only updates"), but "dependabot" itself appears only inside the filename and common user phrasings like "dependabot config", "dependency updates", or "version updates" are absent. This fits the 4 anchor (good coverage, a few natural terms missing) rather than 5, which requires synonyms/extensions comprehensively covered.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

".github/dependabot.yml" and "for a GitHub repo" pin the skill to a single specific file on a single platform, giving it a clear niche with distinct triggers and minimal conflict risk even against sibling skills (renovate-config, dependency-vulnerability-scanning). This clearly matches the 5 anchor.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Reviewed

On this page