Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A thorough, highly actionable audit methodology with a clear sequenced workflow, explicit evidence standards, and a well-placed single reference. The only weakness is verbosity: several caveats and the Scrum Guide framing recur and could be consolidated.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated 'team/organization owns the lines' point, which appears in the scoping section, the Scrum Guide section, and the anti-patterns table, into a single statement to tighten the body.
Trim the 'What the Scrum Guide actually says' section to just the two facts the audit rests on; the multiple Guide URL citations and the ISTQB aside are defensive context that does not advance the audit steps.
Cut the narrative prose around the two-stage split and let the stage table plus the 'Declare the stage before auditing' note carry that content, removing the duplicated explanation.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient procedural content with little explanation of things Claude already knows, but it runs ~280 lines and repeats several points (team-ownership of the lines, Scrum Guide citations, the two-stage split) that could be tightened, matching 'mostly efficient but could be tightened'. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable guidance throughout — exact commands and JSON fields (`gh pr view --json reviews,reviewDecision`, LCOV `LF:`/`LH:` fields, `git diff --name-only`, axe `violations` array) plus a copy-paste output-format template, matching 'fully executable commands; copy-paste ready'. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear six-step sequence (pin revision → split → map → assign states → apply evidence standards → roll up) with explicit validation standards acting as checkpoints and a feedback loop (unverifiable blocks until a named human supplies evidence; re-run against the new head), matching the top anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The long worked example is split into a single one-level-deep, clearly signaled reference at line 250 (`references/worked-example.md`), with the main file holding overview-level method content; navigation is easy and references are not nested. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |