Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable skill body with clear sequencing, strong validation checkpoints for a destructive operation, and clean one-level-deep reference files. The only minor gap is some conceptual framing and quoted external-guide prose that could be trimmed for token efficiency.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and task-oriented with concrete templates and tables, but includes some mild over-explanation of framing concepts ('DR planning requires end-to-end recovery design...') and quoted external-guide passages that could be trimmed. It is efficient with only minor padding, so it sits above the 3-anchor but below the lean 5-anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready templates (pre-drill checklist, drill workflow, post-drill report) plus concrete executable criteria: '60 s is a workable default' monitoring cadence, 'T-30 min' replication-lag check, SHA-256 backup integrity, and explicit abort conditions. Fully actionable guidance covering common cases, matching the 5-anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequenced as Steps 1-8 plus a five-stage run protocol with explicit validation checkpoints: 'Refuse to start when' preconditions, 'abort the failover, record the breach metrics' on RTO breach, and 'verify primary health before recording fail-back complete'. This destructive operation has feedback loops and checklists, matching the 5-anchor and clearing the destructive-validation cap. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Body is an overview with detailed material split into one-level-deep, clearly signaled references: references/backup-verification.md and references/restore-time.md (both real files), linked inline at the relevant steps. Clear section headers and well-organized navigation match the 5-anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |