CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

testland/event-sourcing-tests

Build event-sourcing tests - the given-events / when-command / then-events aggregate test, replay determinism (same events produce the same state), event-versioning + upcasting, snapshot equivalence (replay-to-N vs snapshot-at-N must agree), projection rebuild from the event log, and retroactive event correction. Per martinfowler.com EventSourcing reference. Use when an event-sourced aggregate gains a new event type or a changed payload schema, when snapshots are introduced to shorten replay, or when the event log is the audit system of record.

79

Quality

99%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is lean, executable, and well-structured: a concrete worked example, a sequenced workflow with assertion-based checkpoints, an anti-patterns table, and a single one-level-deep reference that genuinely exists. No concept padding or verbosity.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Lean and efficient: no padding explaining what event sourcing is, assumes Claude's competence, and every section (When/How to use, worked example, anti-patterns, limitations, references) earns its place.

3 / 3

Actionability

Provides fully executable Python test code in the worked example with real assertions (assert new_events == [...] , assert state_a == state_b) - copy-paste ready rather than pseudocode.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The 'How to use' section is a clearly sequenced 6-step process with validation intrinsic to each step (test assertions act as checkpoints), and the worked example shows the base-test-then-layer operational checks loop.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

SKILL.md is a focused overview that points to one real, verified reference file (references/snapshot-versioning-projections.md), one level deep, clearly signaled with anchor text describing its contents; content is appropriately split.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description: concrete, third-person, with explicit 'Use when' triggers covering natural keywords and a distinct niche. It enumerates six specific test categories and names clear activation conditions without padding.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions - 'given-events / when-command / then-events aggregate test, replay determinism', 'event-versioning + upcasting', 'snapshot equivalence', 'projection rebuild', 'retroactive event correction' - each naming a specific testable behavior.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what (the enumerated test types) and when via a clear 'Use when an event-sourced aggregate gains a new event type or a changed payload schema, when snapshots are introduced...' clause.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Good natural-term coverage: 'event-sourcing', 'aggregate', 'snapshot', 'projection', 'event log', 'payload schema', 'audit' are terms users would actually say when needing this skill.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A clear, narrow niche (event-sourced aggregate testing) with distinct triggers unlikely to fire for unrelated skills; uses third person ('Build'), no first/second person.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Reviewed

Table of Contents