Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured reference skill: ordered, gated workflow with concrete numeric thresholds and a verified single-level reference layer. Its only weakness is mild redundancy between the step prose, the Anti-patterns table, and the worked Example.
Suggestions
Tighten conciseness by cross-referencing the Anti-patterns table from the relevant steps instead of restating each failure mode twice, or trim the Anti-patterns table to entries not already covered in Steps 1-6.
Consider collapsing the Example's per-step walkthrough into a single compact decision table, since it mirrors the six-step structure already presented.
The Limitations and References sections partially overlap the Overview's framing of what the skill does not do; merge the harness-validity exclusion so it is stated once.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and table-driven and assumes expert competence (MPSE, CUPED, SUTVA, Kendall's tau are used without over-explaining), but the Anti-patterns table and the worked Example restate concepts already covered in Steps 1-6, so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete numeric decision rules throughout: 'Do not ship on a positive aggregate with a negative segment that represents > 20% of users', 'Minimum run time: two full weeks', plus CI-position tables and alert/block guardrail thresholds make the guidance copy-paste ready for an interpretation skill. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Six interpretation steps are explicitly ordered with hard stops ('if a step blocks, do not proceed to the next'), the guardrail check has STOP gates, and feedback loops (extend runtime, isolate and re-run) handle error recovery. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Body points to a real one-level-deep reference (references/sources.md, verified present) via clearly signaled links and is organized into well-separated sections, with companion catalogs named rather than inlined. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |