Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, lean overview with strong progressive disclosure and concrete actionable examples. Its one gap is workflow_clarity: the session workflow lists clear steps but omits an explicit verification/reproduction checkpoint before findings are filed.
Suggestions
Add an explicit verification step to the How-to-use workflow (e.g. 'Reproduce each candidate finding (target 3/3) before capturing it as a Result'), turning the worked example's implicit practice into a formal checkpoint.
Make the PROOF 'Results' field require a reproduction count or evidence reference so verification is enforced at capture time rather than left implicit.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean: it assumes Claude knows what exploratory testing is, keeps the seven-tours summary as a compact table, and offloads per-tour depth and anti-patterns to reference files rather than padding the overview. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific guidance throughout: a mission→tours picking table, defined PROOF debrief fields, and a worked example with exact cart values ($24.99 → $22.49) and a reproduced bug (STACK50 applied post-tax, 3/3). | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The six-step How-to-use sequence is clearly ordered, but it lacks an explicit reproduce/verify checkpoint before filing findings — the worked example mentions 'reproduces 3/3' yet the process steps never formalize verification as a gate. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A clear overview body points via markdown links to two real, one-level-deep reference files (tours-catalog.md for per-tour detail, tour-anti-patterns.md for failure modes); content is appropriately split and easy to navigate. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |