Authors property-based tests in JavaScript / TypeScript using fast-check - wires `fc.assert(fc.property(arbitrary, ...))`, picks arbitraries (`fc.integer`, `fc.string`, `fc.array`, `fc.tuple`, `fc.record`), uses `.map()` / `.chain()` / `.filter()` to build domain arbitraries, and integrates with Jest / Vitest / Mocha / Jasmine / AVA / Tape. Use when a JS/TS codebase needs PBT to catch edge cases - fast-check has been used to find bugs in major libraries (`query-string`, etc.) and is trusted by Jest, Jasmine, fp-ts, Ramda.
80
100%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Passed
No findings from the security scan
fast-check is "a property-based testing framework for JavaScript and TypeScript, inspired by QuickCheck" (fast-check-readme).
It's runner-agnostic (fast-check-overview): "Test Runner Agnostic: Works seamlessly with Jest, Mocha, Vitest, and other testing frameworks without special integration."
encode(decode(x)) === x).Per fast-check-readme:
npm install fast-check --save-dev
# or
yarn add fast-check --dev
# or
pnpm add -D fast-checkPer fast-check-readme, the canonical Mocha-style example:
import fc from 'fast-check';
const contains = (text, pattern) => text.indexOf(pattern) >= 0;
describe('properties', () => {
it('should always contain itself', () => {
fc.assert(fc.property(fc.string(), (text) => contains(text, text)));
});
it('should always contain its substrings', () => {
fc.assert(
fc.property(fc.string(), fc.string(), fc.string(), (a, b, c) => {
return contains(a + b + c, b);
})
);
});
});The shape: fc.assert(fc.property(<arbitraries...>, (...inputs) => <predicate>)).
The predicate returns:
true → the property holds.false → the property fails.expect(...) style assertions).fc.assert runs the property with 100 generated cases by default;
on failure, fast-check shrinks to the minimal counterexample.
Pick arbitraries that match the input domain, build domain values
with .map() / .chain(), and assemble objects with fc.record.
Full catalog and combinator patterns:
references/arbitraries.md. Prefer
constrained arbitraries (fc.integer({ min: 1 }),
fc.emailAddress()) over broad ones filtered down.
Per fast-check-overview: works "with major testing frameworks including Jest, Vitest, Mocha, Jasmine, AVA, and Tape" without special integration.
// Jest / Vitest example
import { test, expect } from 'vitest';
import fc from 'fast-check';
test('reverse is involutive', () => {
fc.assert(
fc.property(fc.array(fc.integer()), (arr) => {
expect([...arr].reverse().reverse()).toEqual(arr);
})
);
});The assertion library (expect, assert) is the runner's; fast-check
hooks into thrown errors as failures. For async properties use
await fc.assert(fc.asyncProperty(...)).
On failure fast-check prints the shrunk counterexample plus a seed; replaying that seed reproduces the failure deterministically, and a fixed CI seed keeps runs stable. Output format, replay, and CI seed: references/shrinking-and-reproducibility.md.
For concurrent code use fc.scheduler race-condition detection; for
stateful systems use command-sequence model-based testing with
fc.commands / fc.modelRun. Both patterns:
references/stateful-and-async.md.
npm install fast-check --save-dev)..filter().fc.assert(fc.property(<arbitraries...>, (...inputs) => <predicate>));
the predicate returns false or throws on violation.await fc.assert(fc.asyncProperty(...)).fc.scheduler -
references/stateful-and-async.md.A codec exposes encode(obj) and decode(str) and claims
decode(encode(x)) === x for every payload.
import fc from 'fast-check';
import { encode, decode } from './codec';
const payload = fc.record({
id: fc.uuid(),
count: fc.integer({ min: 0 }),
tags: fc.uniqueArray(fc.string()),
});test('decode reverses encode', () => {
fc.assert(
fc.property(payload, (x) => {
expect(decode(encode(x))).toEqual(x);
})
);
});encode silently drops empty-string tags, so the run fails and
fast-check shrinks to the minimal offending input:Property failed after 12 tests
{ seed: 42, path: "11:0", endOnFailure: true }
Counterexample: [{"id":"...","count":0,"tags":[""]}]{ seed: 42, path: "11:0" } reproduces it every time
(references/shrinking-and-reproducibility.md).
Fix encode to preserve empty tags; the property then passes all
100 cases.| Anti-pattern | Why it fails | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Random CI seed | Property fails on CI, passes locally; hard to reproduce. | Fixed seed in CI (shrinking-and-reproducibility.md). |
Heavy .filter() on broad arbitraries | Generation slow; many cases discarded. | Constrained arbitraries (arbitraries.md). |
| Asserting on specific values inside the property | Defeats PBT; that's an example test. | Properties assert relationships; examples go elsewhere. |
| Mocking dependencies inside the property | Mocks don't satisfy properties. | Test pure functions; integration tests for the rest. |
fc.assert(fc.property(...)) without await for async props | Test passes incorrectly (Promise rejected silently). | await fc.assert(fc.asyncProperty(...)). |
Generating an fc.string() for an email field | Wastes generation budget; mostly invalid. | fc.emailAddress() (arbitraries.md). |
| One mega-property that asserts 5 things | When it fails, hard to know which thing. | One property per logical assertion. |
endOnFailure: true to
short-circuit when the unshrunk case is sufficient.fc.record({ ... }) can produce unhelpful types; explicit
type annotations help.fc.scheduler explores
interleavings exhaustively; for many-task tests, runtime grows
fast.fc.assert / fc.property / fc.string, runner integration,
trust list..map /
.chain combinators, race-condition detection, model-based
testing, framework-agnostic positioning.fc.record inputs.hypothesis-testing - Python
sibling.schemathesis-fuzzing - applies fast-check-shaped PBT to API schemas.