CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

testland/flake-pattern-reference

Reference catalog of flake patterns - async/timing, test ordering, shared parallel state, resource leaks, network, locator drift, environment variance, randomness - with detection heuristics and remediation per pattern. Use when triaging an unknown flake to identify the category before bisecting.

75

Quality

94%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files
name:
flake-pattern-reference
description:
Reference catalog of flake patterns - async/timing, test ordering, shared parallel state, resource leaks, network, locator drift, environment variance, randomness - with detection heuristics and remediation per pattern. Use when triaging an unknown flake to identify the category before bisecting.

flake-pattern-reference

Terminology note: "flaky test" is a practitioner-emergent term popularized by the Google Testing Blog (google-causes, google-flaky); ISTQB does not maintain a canonical entry. This catalog reflects industry-engineering consensus, not ISTQB authority.

A flake is rarely random - it almost always falls into one of eight recurring patterns. Identifying the pattern early shrinks the bisect search space dramatically. This catalog is a reference, not a workflow; the matching workflow is in flaky-test-quarantine.

The Google Testing Blog observed a near-linear correlation between test size and flakiness rate across ~4.2M tests (google-causes) - larger tests touch more of the eight patterns at once.

Pattern 1: async / timing

The most common flake category in UI and integration tests.

SignalWhat's happening
Fails ~5 - 20% of runs; passes when the machine is fasterTest waits for an arbitrary setTimeout(N) instead of a deterministic event.
Fails on CI but never locallyCI runners have different cold-start timings than dev laptops.
Fails after a dependency upgrade with no test code changeLibrary's internal timing changed (e.g. Playwright auto-wait window).

Remediation:

  • Replace fixed sleeps with deterministic waits - await expect(loc).toBeVisible(), page.waitForLoadState('networkidle'), page.waitForFunction(...), etc.
  • For animations, disable them in test setup (animations: 'disabled' in Playwright; Cypress.config('animationDistanceThreshold', 0) in Cypress).
  • For absolute clock dependencies, freeze time with sinon.useFakeTimers() / vi.useFakeTimers() / Playwright's page.clock.install().

Pattern 2: test ordering

Tests pass alone, fail when run with siblings.

SignalWhat's happening
npm test -- --testNamePattern='^X$' passes; full run failsTest relies on state from a previously-run test.
Adding a new test breaks an unrelated existing oneImplicit ordering dependency exposed by the new test pushing the old test into a different position.
Random-order test runners (Jest randomize) flag the suiteSuite is order-dependent.

Remediation:

  • Run the suite with explicit randomization in CI to surface ordering deps early (jest --randomize, pytest --random-order, mocha --sort reverse).
  • Move ANY shared setup into beforeEach / afterEach, never rely on beforeAll for state that the test mutates.
  • Database tests: roll back transactions after each test instead of truncating between describe blocks.

Pattern 3: shared parallel state

Tests pass sequentially, fail when run in parallel workers.

SignalWhat's happening
Fails ~50% of runs in CI matrix; passes locally with -j 1Two workers writing to the same DB row / file / port.
Fails more often as worker count goes upLinear shared-state contention.
Error message mentions "duplicate key" / "address in use" / "file already exists"Direct collision evidence.

Remediation:

  • Find the shared state two workers collide on - DB rows, files, ports, or global module state.
  • Per-worker isolation: per-worker DB schemas (PG_SCHEMA=test_${WORKER}), per-worker temp dirs (TMPDIR=/tmp/test-${WORKER}), per-worker port ranges.
  • For unique IDs: use UUIDs or a per-worker namespace prefix, not auto-increment integers shared across workers.

Pattern 4: resource leaks

Tests pass on a fresh machine, fail after the test process has run for hours.

SignalWhat's happening
Fails increasingly often as suite duration growsMemory or file-descriptor leak in the test setup.
EMFILE / EADDRINUSE errors mid-suiteFile-descriptor or port exhaustion.
Long-running processes (Playwright browsers, Cypress runners) crash mid-suiteProcess accumulating zombies.

Remediation:

  • Always await browser.close() / await server.close() in afterAll, with a try/finally so failed tests still clean up.
  • Set per-test timeouts and ensure the framework kills the process, not just the test (--testTimeout, test.setTimeout()).
  • Run lsof | wc -l and ps aux | wc -l before / after the suite in CI to detect leaks; alert when growth exceeds a threshold.

Pattern 5: network / external service

Tests pass when the upstream is healthy, fail otherwise.

SignalWhat's happening
Fails on the same handful of tests that hit the same external URLReal network call to a flaky third party.
Fails right after a deploy of a non-test serviceTest is hitting prod / staging of a sibling service.
ETIMEDOUT / ECONNRESET in error logsNetwork-layer error, not test-logic error.

Remediation:

  • Mock at the boundary - never let test code reach a real network endpoint. Use Mock Service Worker (MSW), nock, WireMock, or Playwright's page.route().
  • For tests that must hit a real service (smoke / contract tests), isolate them in a separate suite that doesn't gate the main CI.
  • DNS-level: pin to specific resolvers in CI to avoid resolver variance.

Pattern 6: locator drift

UI tests pass when the page looks one way, fail when it shifts.

SignalWhat's happening
Fails after an unrelated CSS changeSelector matched by position rather than identity.
selector matched 2 elements errorsAmbiguous selector now matches more than one node.
Fails only at certain viewportsLayout shifts cause mobile / desktop selectors to differ.

Remediation:

  • Use role-based selectors first (page.getByRole('button', { name: 'Submit' })), then data-testid, only text= / CSS as a last resort.
  • For Playwright: enable strict: true so any ambiguous selector fails immediately rather than silently picking the first match.
  • For viewport-specific UIs: snapshot at every breakpoint via responsive-breakpoint-runner; visual signal exposes layout-shift flakes faster than text checks.

Pattern 7: environment variance

Tests pass on Linux CI, fail on macOS dev machines (or vice versa).

SignalWhat's happening
Fails only on a specific CI runner / OSOS-specific path separator, line ending, or filesystem case sensitivity.
Snapshot tests fail with sub-pixel diffs across OSOS font / anti-aliasing differences (see playwright-snapshots).
Fails in tz configurations not set to UTCTimezone-sensitive assertion.

Remediation:

  • Pin CI to one OS / one timezone (TZ=UTC) for deterministic runs.
  • Run snapshot updates only in CI, never from a developer laptop (per playwright-snapshots).
  • For path-sensitive code, normalize with path.posix.join() / node:path.

Pattern 8: randomness

Tests use random data without a controlled seed.

SignalWhat's happening
Failures don't reproduce on retryTest data was randomized; the failing combination is gone.
Test asserts a property that holds "almost always"Property-based test exposing a real edge case (this is good - fix the production bug).
Faker-generated data triggers a layout overflowRandom string longer than the assertion expected.

Remediation:

  • Seed every random source: Math.random via seedrandom, faker via faker.seed(N), property-based testing via fc.assert(prop, { seed }).
  • For property-based failures, don't mark them as flake - copy the failing seed into a regression test.
  • Persist the seed used in each CI run as a build artifact so a flake can be replayed.

Triage decision tree

Test fails ~50% of runs?
├── Yes → likely "shared parallel state" or "test ordering"
└── No → fails ~5-20% of runs?
    ├── Yes → likely "async/timing" or "network"
    └── No → fails only on specific OS / runner?
        ├── Yes → "environment variance"
        └── No → fails after long suite duration?
            ├── Yes → "resource leaks"
            └── No → fails after unrelated UI change?
                ├── Yes → "locator drift"
                └── No → does the test use random data?
                    ├── Yes → "randomness"
                    └── No → run a structured bisect

For systematic bisection, run a structured bisect that varies one axis at a time per the patterns above.

References

  • google-flaky - Google Testing Blog overview.
  • google-causes - Google's correlation analysis on ~4.2M tests; "test size correlates with flakiness rate."
  • flaky-test-quarantine - workflow that uses this catalog during triage.
Workspace
testland
Visibility
Public
Created
Last updated
Publish Source
GitHub
Badge
testland/flake-pattern-reference badge