Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, highly actionable, and presents well-sequenced workflows with explicit gating and verification checkpoints. Its only weakness is progressive disclosure: everything lives inline in one longer file with no bundle-file split for the denser reference material.
Suggestions
Move the full GitHub Actions workflow YAML and the per-subgraph Federation loop into a dedicated reference file (e.g. references/ci-integration.md), keeping SKILL.md as an overview that links to it, so the denser material is one level deep rather than inline.
Extract the rules table (dangerousBreaking, suppressRemovalOfDeprecatedField, ignoreDescriptionChanges, safeUnreachable, considerUsage) plus the custom-rule module example into a references/rules.md file, with SKILL.md summarizing the canonical two rules inline and pointing to the rest.
List the bundle files you create in a References section with clear one-level-deep links (e.g. 'CI integration: see ci-integration.md'), signaling the split explicitly to aid navigation.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and table-driven (classification and rules tables), assumes GraphQL/CI competence without explaining basics, and uses compact prose; it earns its tokens rather than padding, matching the 'lean and efficient' anchor over the 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' level 2. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready guidance — `npm install`/`npx` commands, `graphql-inspector diff`/`introspect` invocations, a complete GitHub Actions YAML, and `--rule` flag examples — satisfying the 'fully executable code/commands' anchor rather than the pseudocode/incomplete level 2. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The CI workflow is explicitly sequenced (checkout with fetch-depth 0, setup-node, extract base via `git merge-base`, diff) with the exit-code gate stated as the validation checkpoint, and the Federation batch loop is paired with `rover supergraph compose` verification; this meets the 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps' anchor rather than the implicit-checkpoint level 2. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized and the external doc links ([gqi-overview], [gqi-diff]) are clearly signaled one level deep, but the ~190-line body keeps all detail inline (full CI YAML, rules table, Federation loop) with no split into bundle files; this fits 'content that should be separate is inline' (level 2) rather than the 'content appropriately split' level 3. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |