Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a strong, substantive authoring skill: highly actionable worked-example templates, a clearly sequenced five-step workflow with explicit validation gates and feedback loops, and well-organized sections with one-level external references. Its only weakness is conceptual preamble in the Overview that restates rationale Claude largely already knows.
Suggestions
Tighten the Overview and 'third leg of the tripod' framing - remove rationale Claude can infer and lead with the skill's concrete purpose and output.
Trim the per-reference annotation sentences in the References section to a clause each; the URLs and sibling-skill names carry most of the signal.
Consider moving the long four-level worked-example block into a references/ template file so the body stays a lean overview, leaving the in-skill example as a single representative question.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The worked examples, pitfall tables, and calibration script are load-bearing and concrete, but the Overview and tripod-framing prose restate inter-rater-reliability rationale and structured-interview concepts Claude largely already knows, which could be tightened - matching the score-2 'mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation' anchor rather than the lean score-3 anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready templates: four scored gold-standard answers per question with explicit 'Why score N' rationale tied to rubric anchors, a pitfall table with concrete corrections, a timed calibration-session script (90 min, ~10 min/question), and a structured output document with a numbered hand-off block - matching the score-3 anchor for fully executable, specific examples. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The five steps are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints - the INSUFFICIENT_TRANSCRIPTS halt below 2 transcripts, 'Do not schedule real candidates before this session is complete', and a retro after the first 5 candidates - plus feedback loops for anchor refinement, matching the score-3 anchor for clear sequence with explicit validation and error-recovery loops. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist to structure; the body is organized into clear sections (Overview, When to use, Steps 1-5, Anti-patterns, Limitations, References) with one-level-deep, clearly signaled external references (sibling skills, ISTQB glossary, research links) and no nested/2+ level reference chains, matching the score-3 anchor for well-organized sections and easy navigation. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |