CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

testland/jaeger-trace-tests

Author integration tests that query a tracing backend for cross-service trace verification - Jaeger, Zipkin, or Grafana Tempo, same run-query-assert workflow. Jaeger all-in-one Docker for CI (OTLP gRPC :4317 + HTTP :4318 ingest, query API on :16686), `/api/traces?service=X&operation=Y` query patterns, span set + parent-child + duration assertions; Zipkin (:9411 REST API, B3 single/multi-header propagation tests, dependency graph) in references/zipkin.md; Tempo (TraceQL span selectors + structural operators, /api/search, single-binary Docker) in references/tempo.md. Use when verifying that a request produces the expected spans across service boundaries in a running Jaeger, Zipkin, or Tempo backend.

75

Quality

94%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

SKILL.md

name:
jaeger-trace-tests
description:
Author integration tests that query a tracing backend for cross-service trace verification - Jaeger, Zipkin, or Grafana Tempo, same run-query-assert workflow. Jaeger all-in-one Docker for CI (OTLP gRPC :4317 + HTTP :4318 ingest, query API on :16686), `/api/traces?service=X&operation=Y` query patterns, span set + parent-child + duration assertions; Zipkin (:9411 REST API, B3 single/multi-header propagation tests, dependency graph) in references/zipkin.md; Tempo (TraceQL span selectors + structural operators, /api/search, single-binary Docker) in references/tempo.md. Use when verifying that a request produces the expected spans across service boundaries in a running Jaeger, Zipkin, or Tempo backend.
metadata:
{"keywords":"jaeger, distributed-tracing, integration-testing, opentelemetry, trace-query","version":"1.1.10"}

jaeger-trace-tests

Jaeger ingests traces over OTLP and exposes a query API for verification. Per the Jaeger getting-started docs, the all-in-one image "combines collector and query components in a single process and uses a transient in-memory storage for trace data" - perfect for CI.

When to use

  • E2E or integration test exercises multiple services and you need to verify the full distributed trace shape (not just per-process spans).
  • Production observability stack uses Jaeger; tests should reflect the same query API your alerts/SLOs depend on.
  • Smoke test after instrumentation changes - confirm spans actually reach Jaeger (not just the SDK exporter).

How to use

  1. Start Jaeger all-in-one in CI as a Docker service (Step 1) - it exposes OTLP ingest on :4317/:4318 and the query API on :16686.
  2. Point the app's OpenTelemetry SDK at the collector's OTLP endpoint (Step 2).
  3. Exercise the flow, force_flush() the span processor, and let the ingest pipeline settle before querying (Worked example).
  4. Query GET /api/traces?service=X&operation=Y and assert on the returned span set and tags (Worked example); parent-child + duration assertions and the full query API live in references/query-api-and-ci-wiring.md.
  5. Scope each test to a unique service.name so shared-CI trace data does not cross-contaminate (see references).

Step 1 - Run Jaeger all-in-one in CI

Per the Jaeger getting-started docs:

docker run --rm --name jaeger \
  -p 16686:16686 \
  -p 4317:4317 \
  -p 4318:4318 \
  -p 5778:5778 \
  -p 9411:9411 \
  cr.jaegertracing.io/jaegertracing/jaeger:2.17.0
PortPurpose
16686Jaeger UI + query HTTP API
4317OTLP/gRPC ingest
4318OTLP/HTTP ingest

The full port map (sampling :5778, Zipkin :9411) and the GitHub Actions service block are in references/query-api-and-ci-wiring.md.

Step 2 - Configure SDK to ship to Jaeger

from opentelemetry import trace
from opentelemetry.sdk.trace import TracerProvider
from opentelemetry.sdk.trace.export import BatchSpanProcessor
from opentelemetry.exporter.otlp.proto.grpc.trace_exporter import OTLPSpanExporter

provider = TracerProvider()
provider.add_span_processor(
    BatchSpanProcessor(OTLPSpanExporter(endpoint="http://localhost:4317", insecure=True))
)
trace.set_tracer_provider(provider)

BatchSpanProcessor defers shipping, so the Worked example flushes manually before querying.

Worked example

Exercise the flow, force a flush, then query Jaeger and assert the span set plus a tag value end to end:

def test_order_trace_visible_in_jaeger():
    with use_tracer():
        create_order(items=[item])

    # Flush all spans to Jaeger before query
    trace.get_tracer_provider().force_flush(timeout_millis=5000)

    # Allow Jaeger ingest pipeline a moment
    time.sleep(0.5)

    resp = requests.get(
        "http://localhost:16686/api/traces",
        params={"service": "orders", "operation": "order.create", "lookback": "1m", "limit": 1},
    )
    traces = resp.json()["data"]
    assert len(traces) == 1
    span = next(s for s in traces[0]["spans"] if s["operationName"] == "order.create")
    tag = next(t for t in span["tags"] if t["key"] == "order.item_count")
    assert tag["value"] == 1

The force_flush + brief sleep is mandatory: BatchSpanProcessor batches exports, so an immediate query races the ingest pipeline and misses the span. For parent-child links and duration ceilings, see references/query-api-and-ci-wiring.md.

Other backends - Zipkin and Tempo

The same workflow (backend in Docker, ship OTLP, flush, query, assert) applies to the other two mainstream OSS backends; only the query surface changes:

  • Zipkin (Spring Cloud Sleuth heritage; B3 propagation) - REST API on :9411, string-typed tags, dependency-graph assertions, B3 single/multi-header tests: references/zipkin.md.
  • Grafana Tempo - TraceQL span selectors with structural operators (>> descendant, > child) that Jaeger's flat span list cannot express, /api/search + /api/traces/{id}: references/tempo.md.

Anti-patterns

Anti-patternWhy it failsFix
Query Jaeger immediately after exerciseSpans may not have shipped yetforce_flush() + brief sleep (Worked example)
Use prod Jaeger from CITest traces pollute prod dataAlways Docker all-in-one (Step 1)
Hard-code service name across testsCross-test contamination on shared CIUnique service.name per test (references)
Assume long retentionAll-in-one is in-memory; old traces evictedRestart container or shorten test runs
Skip flushing pipelineBatchSpanProcessor defers ship; queries miss spansAlways flush before query (Worked example)

Limitations

  • Jaeger v2 changed deployment + binary names from v1; verify current image tag at the Jaeger getting-started docs.
  • Storage backends (Cassandra, Elasticsearch, OpenSearch, Badger) matter for production but Docker all-in-one is sufficient for CI.
  • Jaeger UI is for humans; only query HTTP API in tests (no scraping HTML).

References

SKILL.md

tile.json