CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
PluginPublic

testland/jmeter-load-testing

Use when a project already uses Apache JMeter or needs JVM-native load testing: .jmx test plans with thread groups, HTTP samplers, assertions and listeners, headless jmeter -n runs, the HTML dashboard and CI gates from JTL results.

Quality

88%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

Quality

Content

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A strong, reference-style skill: nearly everything is concrete and copy-paste executable, from CLI flags to CI gating, and it stays lean by relying on tables and code rather than prose. The main improvement opportunities are trimming the small amount of background explanation and adding an explicit remediation loop for failed CI gates.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dominated by dense tables and executable code with little padding, but 'Apache JMeter is the long-running JVM-native load-testing tool' explains a concept Claude already knows, and the Limitations section partially restates the When-to-use guidance.

4 / 5

Actionability

Fully executable throughout: the canonical 'jmeter -n -t test.jmx -l results.jtl' invocation, complete flag tables, awk parsing one-liners, ${__P(...)} parameterization, and a copy-paste-ready GitHub Actions workflow with Docker and a pass/fail gate covering the common cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Sections sequence logically (Install, Running, Parsing results, CI integration, Anti-patterns) and the CI workflow includes an explicit pass/fail gate with a threshold and exit 1, but there is no explicit validate-then-fix feedback loop when a gate fails, only the implicit percentile-gate anti-pattern row.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist, so the skill is self-contained with well-organized, clearly headed sections; however the ~48-line CI YAML and the JTL column listing are inlined where a one-level-deep reference file could carry them, and the body is well over the 50-line threshold where sections alone would suffice.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description with an explicit Use-when clause, concrete trigger phrases, and a comprehensive capability list tied to specific JMeter artifacts. The only refinements would be adding common synonyms (performance/stress testing) and sharpening the boundary against sibling JVM load-testing tools.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete capabilities comprehensively — '.jmx test plans with thread groups, HTTP samplers, assertions and listeners', 'headless jmeter -n runs', 'the HTML dashboard and CI gates from JTL results' — covering authoring artifacts, execution, reporting, and gating with no gaps in the skill's scope.

5 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both questions: 'Use when a project already uses Apache JMeter or needs JVM-native load testing' gives concrete when-triggers, and the colon-delimited list states exactly what the skill covers.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Good natural keyword coverage including the tool name, the '.jmx' file extension, 'load testing', 'JTL', and 'HTML dashboard', but common user synonyms such as 'performance testing', 'stress testing', or 'throughput' are missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Triggers are strongly JMeter-specific (.jmx, JTL, jmeter -n), creating a clear niche, but 'needs JVM-native load testing' has minor overlap risk with closely related sibling skills like Gatling (also JVM) and the k6/Locust alternatives the body references.

4 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Reviewed

On this page