Content
80%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, lean reference catalog with concrete values, formulas, and actionable fixes; it scores well on conciseness and actionability. It loses points on workflow clarity (no sequenced procedure with checkpoints) and progressive disclosure (a single monolithic file rather than split references).
Suggestions
Add a short sequenced decision flow for sizing a Lambda timeout (e.g., pick integration ceiling -> set Lambda timeout below it -> add remaining-time check -> verify with the testable behaviours) with explicit validation checkpoints to lift workflow_clarity.
Split the large inline tables (integration cascade, anti-patterns, testable behaviours) into a references/ file referenced one level deep from SKILL.md so the overview stays a lean pointer, improving progressive_disclosure.
Replace the pseudocode handler snippet's placeholders (not_done, do_work_chunk(), ...) with a minimal but complete executable example, or explicitly note the placeholders are illustrative.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and table-driven — specific values (900s, 29s, $0.20/1M, 1769MB = 1 vCPU), formulas, and threshold rules — with little padding, and the doc quotes it cites are the reference payload rather than concepts Claude already knows. It is above level 2 because nearly every token earns its place; the few advisory lines ("Don't try to architect around the 15-minute limit") are brief, not verbose. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete, copy-paste-ready guidance dominates: the GB-second formula, per-integration timeout thresholds ("Lambda timeout MUST be < 29s"), and the anti-patterns table's specific fixes ("Visibility > Lambda timeout x 6"). The single Python snippet uses pseudocode placeholders, but as a reference catalog the actionable output is configuration values and thresholds, which are complete rather than missing key details — keeping it at the top anchor per the instruction-only guidance in scoring_notes. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | There is no multi-step sequenced workflow with explicit validation checkpoints — the body is reference material, not a procedure — though the "Testable behaviours" table does provide verification tests. It is not level 3 because a sequenced process with feedback loops is absent, and not level 1 because the testable-behaviours table supplies some validation guidance. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is well-organized into clear sections with a References section, but everything lives in one monolithic ~150-line SKILL.md with no bundle files to split into, so content is not "appropriately split" across files as the top anchor requires. It is above level 1 because sectioning and signaled external/companion references (cold-start-budget-reference, AWS docs URLs) give real structure rather than a wall of text. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |