CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

testland/lcov-analysis

Parses LCOV `.info` text files (the de-facto coverage interchange format produced by gcov, llvm-cov, Coverage.py via `py2lcov`, JaCoCo via `xml2lcov`, Devel::Cover, Jest via `lcov` reporter, NYC, and most others). Extracts per-file line / function / branch metrics from the canonical record keywords (TN/SF/FN/FNDA/FNF/FNH/BRDA/BRF/BRH/DA/LH/LF), computes the diff vs a baseline, and emits per-file gating verdicts. Use for PR coverage gates that don't depend on a specific language runtime.

74

Quality

93%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

Low

Low-risk findings.

1 low severity finding. Worth noting, but not necessarily harmful.

Low

W011: Third-party content exposure detected (indirect prompt injection risk).

What this means

The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.

Why it was flagged

This skill’s required runtime workflow reads outsider-authored free text from LCOV `.info` files produced externally (e.g., baseline and current artifacts downloaded in CI, then parsed line-by-line via `open(path)` in `scripts/parse_lcov.py`-style logic), so attacker-controlled `SF/FN/DA/BRDA/...` lines could be injected into the LLM context if the agent includes those parsed results.

Report incorrect finding
Audited
Security analysis
Snyk