Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is actionable and well-disclosed with lean, Linear-specific executable guidance. The one gap is workflow clarity: batch/state-transition flows lack explicit validation checkpoints, capping that dimension at 2.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation checkpoint to the bulk-transition flow (e.g., after issueUpdate, re-query the issue to confirm state.type changed before declaring success) to satisfy the batch/destructive-operation feedback-loop requirement.
Turn 'How to use' into a numbered, verify-then-proceed sequence with a 'verify the transition applied' step so the workflow meets the rubric's explicit-validation anchor.
Surface a short error-recovery note for the GraphQL errors-on-HTTP-200 case (check data.get('errors')) as a workflow-level checkpoint rather than only inside create_bug.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and dense with executable code plus Linear-specific gotchas ("personal API keys use the Authorization header without the Bearer prefix", "1 is highest urgency", resolve-by-type), avoiding explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready functions (create_bug, get_states, transition, find_dupes, create_or_attach) with real GraphQL queries and concrete auth/header setup. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | "How to use" lists 4 sequenced steps and dedupe-before-create, but there are no explicit validate-then-proceed checkpoints; per the rubric, missing verification in batch/destructive operations ("Transitioning bugs in bulk after a release") caps this at 2. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Core quick-start lives in SKILL.md while deep helpers (transition_to_completed, all-teams query, CI wiring) are in a real, one-level-deep references/linear-graphql-reference.md signaled by name in multiple sections. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |