Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, highly actionable test-authoring recipe with a clearly sequenced workflow and an explicit failure→fix feedback loop. Its main weakness is structure: everything is packed into one monolithic file with no progressive disclosure into reference files.
Suggestions
Move the full per-locale date/number/currency expectation tables (Steps 2–4) into a reference file (e.g. references/locale-expectations.md) and keep SKILL.md as an overview pointing to it, so the main file stays a concise entry point.
Extract the worked example and CI matrix block into a references/ or scripts/ file, signaling them with one-level-deep links from the corresponding steps.
Add a brief validation note in Step 5 or 7 stating the expected pass/fail behavior (e.g. 'if any locale assertion fails, trace to CLDR per Step 8 before adjusting expectations') to make the feedback loop explicit at the step level.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and table/code-driven — exact per-locale format tables, copy-paste Playwright snippets, a CI matrix block, and tight anti-pattern/limitation tables — with almost no padding. It assumes Claude's competence (no explainer on what a locale or a Playwright test is) and earns its tokens. Not score 2 because there is no unnecessary explanation to tighten; the brief Overview bug examples are motivating, not redundant concept explanation. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready Playwright TypeScript tests asserting exact rendered strings ('toHaveText("1.234,56 €")', 'toHaveText("12,34,567")'), a concrete CI yaml loop, and a playwright.config projects snippet. Not score 2: no pseudocode; commands and assertions are specific and complete. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | An explicit 8-step sequence (identify library → expectations → author tests → timezone → CI matrix → CLDR trace) with the CI run as the validation checkpoint, and the Worked Example demonstrates an explicit failure→diagnose→fix→repass feedback loop ('The de-DE case fails ... Replacing the format call ... makes all three locales pass'). This is not destructive/batch work, so the cap note does not apply; it matches the score-3 anchor with explicit validation and an error-recovery loop. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist (references/, scripts/, assets/ are absent) and all detail — the full per-locale date/number/currency tables, all code samples, the worked example, and the CI config — lives inline in a single ~200-line SKILL.md. Sections are well-labeled and organized, but nothing is split into one-level-deep reference files, matching the score-2 anchor 'content that should be separate is inline' rather than the score-3 'content appropriately split' anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |