The email-testing home: configures and runs Mailpit - modern dev-mailbox server for SMTP testing with built-in REST API for assertions; default SMTP `1025` + Web UI `8025`; Chaos mode (configurable SMTP errors for resilience testing), message tagging, search filters. Carries the end-to-end email-flow workflow (multipart body, link-rewrite resolution, unsubscribe per RFC 8058, bounce + complaint webhooks) in references/email-flows.md and the legacy MailHog capture patterns + migration path in references/mailhog-legacy.md. Use when developing or testing email-sending code locally / in CI - SMTP capture, full-flow assertions, or migrating an existing MailHog deployment.
72
91%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Email is the most underspecified surface in modern web apps. A "the email got sent" assertion misses:
This is a build-an-X workflow - a checklist and per-stage test recipes, not a single tool. The SMTP capture layer is the host SKILL.md (Mailpit) or mailhog-legacy.md.
Per the host SKILL.md:
# CI config
services:
mailpit:
image: axllent/mailpit:v1.20.0
ports: [1025:1025, 8025:8025]Configure the app to relay via this SMTP for the test environment.
from email_test_helpers import trigger_password_reset, capture_one_email
def test_password_reset_email_complete():
msg = capture_one_email(
action=lambda: trigger_password_reset("alice@example.com"),
recipient="alice@example.com",
timeout=5,
)
# Now assert against `msg`(capture_one_email is the helper from the host SKILL.md Step 4.)
def test_email_headers(msg):
assert msg["From"]["Address"] == "noreply@example.com"
assert msg["To"][0]["Address"] == "alice@example.com"
assert msg["Subject"] == "Reset your password"
assert "List-Unsubscribe" in msg["Headers"] # required by Gmail/Yahoo bulk-sender rules
assert "List-Unsubscribe-Post" in msg["Headers"] # one-click unsubscribe per RFC 8058For relayed-via-MTA tests (where DKIM signing happens), additional checks:
Return-PathFromThese checks require a relay capable of signing (production MTA or a test-relay like Postmark sandbox). Mailpit doesn't sign; verify DKIM in a separate staging-with-real-MTA test layer.
Email is multipart: HTML and plain-text alternatives. Both need verification:
def test_email_body_alternatives(msg):
# Plain-text body present
assert msg["Text"]
assert "alice" in msg["Text"]
assert "/reset?token=" in msg["Text"]
# HTML body present + matches plain-text intent
html = msg["HTML"]
assert "<a href=" in html
assert "/reset?token=" in html
# The "view in browser" link
assert ("/view-in-browser/" in html) or ("This email best viewed" in html)Per RFC 2046 §5.1.4, mailers should always include a plain-text alternative; tests catch when developers ship HTML-only emails by accident.
Many email service providers (Mailgun, SendGrid, Postmark, Customer.io) rewrite links for click tracking. After rewriting, the link in the captured email points to the ESP's tracker, not the target URL.
Test pattern: assert against the final URL after redirect, not the rewritten one:
import requests
def resolve_redirects(url, max_hops=5):
for _ in range(max_hops):
response = requests.get(url, allow_redirects=False, timeout=5)
if response.status_code not in (301, 302, 303, 307, 308):
return response.url
url = response.headers["Location"]
raise ValueError("Too many redirects")
def test_password_reset_link_resolves_to_app(msg):
link = extract_first_link(msg["HTML"])
final_url = resolve_redirects(link)
assert "example.com/reset" in final_url
assert "token=" in final_urlFor tests of unsigned ESP links, accept the rewrite as expected and test that resolution lands on the app's domain.
def test_unsubscribe_link_works(msg):
unsubscribe_url = msg["Headers"]["List-Unsubscribe"][0].strip("<>")
response = requests.post(unsubscribe_url)
assert response.status_code == 200
# Verify the user is now unsubscribed:
user = User.objects.get(email="alice@example.com")
assert user.subscribed is FalsePer RFC 8058, one-click unsubscribe is a POST (not GET) to the
List-Unsubscribe URL with body List-Unsubscribe=One-Click.
Bounces (delivery failures) and complaints (recipient marks as spam) come from the ESP via webhook. Test the app's handler with a representative payload:
def test_bounce_webhook_marks_user_undeliverable(client):
bounce_payload = {
"event": "bounce",
"recipient": "bounce@nonexistent.example.com",
"reason": "550 5.1.1 user unknown",
}
response = client.post("/webhooks/email-events", json=bounce_payload)
assert response.status_code == 200
user = User.objects.get(email="bounce@nonexistent.example.com")
assert user.email_status == "undeliverable"For each ESP, find a sample bounce/complaint payload in the ESP's docs and use it as the test fixture.
These are MTA-side concerns; tests in CI typically don't validate them. For a pre-production layer:
For each email flow in scope:
List-Unsubscribe (Step 3)| Anti-pattern | Why it fails | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Test only "the send happened" | Misses every content + link issue | Steps 3 - 6 |
| Skip plain-text alternative | Many corporate gateways strip HTML; bare HTML emails appear blank | Always assert both (Step 4) |
| Hardcode rewritten ESP link | Tests fail when ESP rotates tracker domains | Resolve to final URL (Step 5) |
| Skip unsubscribe test | Compliance failure (CAN-SPAM, CASL, GDPR) + ISP penalties | One-click test (Step 6) |
| Skip bounce/complaint webhooks | Sender reputation degrades; deliverability drops | Per-ESP fixture tests (Step 7) |
pdf-print-render-adjacent
domain (visual regression for email).webhook-delivery-tester -
companion: bounce/complaint webhook handlers receive vendor
webhooks; same patternssms-test-author,
push-notification-test-author - sister channels