CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

testland/mailpit-testing

The email-testing home: configures and runs Mailpit - modern dev-mailbox server for SMTP testing with built-in REST API for assertions; default SMTP `1025` + Web UI `8025`; Chaos mode (configurable SMTP errors for resilience testing), message tagging, search filters. Carries the end-to-end email-flow workflow (multipart body, link-rewrite resolution, unsubscribe per RFC 8058, bounce + complaint webhooks) in references/email-flows.md and the legacy MailHog capture patterns + migration path in references/mailhog-legacy.md. Use when developing or testing email-sending code locally / in CI - SMTP capture, full-flow assertions, or migrating an existing MailHog deployment.

72

Quality

91%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

email-flows.mdreferences/

End-to-end email-flow test workflow

Email is the most underspecified surface in modern web apps. A "the email got sent" assertion misses:

  • Did the user receive both HTML + plain-text alternatives? (RFC 2046 §5.1.4 multipart/alternative)
  • Was the link in the email actually correct (after tracking rewrites)?
  • Did the unsubscribe link work?
  • For relayed messages: do DKIM / SPF / DMARC pass?
  • Does the app handle bounces + complaints?

This is a build-an-X workflow - a checklist and per-stage test recipes, not a single tool. The SMTP capture layer is the host SKILL.md (Mailpit) or mailhog-legacy.md.

When to use

  • Any feature triggers a transactional email (signup, password reset, order confirmation, account notification).
  • Marketing-email integration with the app needs regression coverage.
  • Compliance review requires evidence of unsubscribe + bounce handling.

Step 1 - Stage your capture environment

Per the host SKILL.md:

# CI config
services:
  mailpit:
    image: axllent/mailpit:v1.20.0
    ports: [1025:1025, 8025:8025]

Configure the app to relay via this SMTP for the test environment.

Step 2 - Trigger + capture

from email_test_helpers import trigger_password_reset, capture_one_email

def test_password_reset_email_complete():
    msg = capture_one_email(
        action=lambda: trigger_password_reset("alice@example.com"),
        recipient="alice@example.com",
        timeout=5,
    )
    # Now assert against `msg`

(capture_one_email is the helper from the host SKILL.md Step 4.)

Step 3 - Header assertions

def test_email_headers(msg):
    assert msg["From"]["Address"] == "noreply@example.com"
    assert msg["To"][0]["Address"] == "alice@example.com"
    assert msg["Subject"] == "Reset your password"
    assert "List-Unsubscribe" in msg["Headers"]    # required by Gmail/Yahoo bulk-sender rules
    assert "List-Unsubscribe-Post" in msg["Headers"]   # one-click unsubscribe per RFC 8058

For relayed-via-MTA tests (where DKIM signing happens), additional checks:

  • DKIM signature present + valid
  • SPF-aligned Return-Path
  • DMARC-aligned From

These checks require a relay capable of signing (production MTA or a test-relay like Postmark sandbox). Mailpit doesn't sign; verify DKIM in a separate staging-with-real-MTA test layer.

Step 4 - Body content assertions

Email is multipart: HTML and plain-text alternatives. Both need verification:

def test_email_body_alternatives(msg):
    # Plain-text body present
    assert msg["Text"]
    assert "alice" in msg["Text"]
    assert "/reset?token=" in msg["Text"]

    # HTML body present + matches plain-text intent
    html = msg["HTML"]
    assert "<a href=" in html
    assert "/reset?token=" in html

    # The "view in browser" link
    assert ("/view-in-browser/" in html) or ("This email best viewed" in html)

Per RFC 2046 §5.1.4, mailers should always include a plain-text alternative; tests catch when developers ship HTML-only emails by accident.

Step 5 - Link rewriting + tracking pixels

Many email service providers (Mailgun, SendGrid, Postmark, Customer.io) rewrite links for click tracking. After rewriting, the link in the captured email points to the ESP's tracker, not the target URL.

Test pattern: assert against the final URL after redirect, not the rewritten one:

import requests

def resolve_redirects(url, max_hops=5):
    for _ in range(max_hops):
        response = requests.get(url, allow_redirects=False, timeout=5)
        if response.status_code not in (301, 302, 303, 307, 308):
            return response.url
        url = response.headers["Location"]
    raise ValueError("Too many redirects")

def test_password_reset_link_resolves_to_app(msg):
    link = extract_first_link(msg["HTML"])
    final_url = resolve_redirects(link)
    assert "example.com/reset" in final_url
    assert "token=" in final_url

For tests of unsigned ESP links, accept the rewrite as expected and test that resolution lands on the app's domain.

Step 6 - Unsubscribe-link verification

def test_unsubscribe_link_works(msg):
    unsubscribe_url = msg["Headers"]["List-Unsubscribe"][0].strip("<>")
    response = requests.post(unsubscribe_url)
    assert response.status_code == 200

    # Verify the user is now unsubscribed:
    user = User.objects.get(email="alice@example.com")
    assert user.subscribed is False

Per RFC 8058, one-click unsubscribe is a POST (not GET) to the List-Unsubscribe URL with body List-Unsubscribe=One-Click.

Step 7 - Bounce + complaint handling

Bounces (delivery failures) and complaints (recipient marks as spam) come from the ESP via webhook. Test the app's handler with a representative payload:

def test_bounce_webhook_marks_user_undeliverable(client):
    bounce_payload = {
        "event": "bounce",
        "recipient": "bounce@nonexistent.example.com",
        "reason": "550 5.1.1 user unknown",
    }
    response = client.post("/webhooks/email-events", json=bounce_payload)
    assert response.status_code == 200

    user = User.objects.get(email="bounce@nonexistent.example.com")
    assert user.email_status == "undeliverable"

For each ESP, find a sample bounce/complaint payload in the ESP's docs and use it as the test fixture.

Step 8 - DKIM/SPF/DMARC for production-bound emails

These are MTA-side concerns; tests in CI typically don't validate them. For a pre-production layer:

  • mail-tester.com: send a test email; receive a 0 - 10 deliverability score covering DKIM/SPF/DMARC + content quality
  • dmarcian.com: per-domain DMARC monitoring for production
  • Postmark / SendGrid / Mailgun inbound parse sandbox to test what arrives

Step 9 - End-to-end test recipe

For each email flow in scope:

  1. ✅ Trigger + capture via Mailpit (Step 2)
  2. ✅ Header assertions including List-Unsubscribe (Step 3)
  3. ✅ Multipart body - both text + HTML present (Step 4)
  4. ✅ Link rewrites resolve to app domain (Step 5)
  5. ✅ Unsubscribe one-click POST works (Step 6)
  6. ✅ Bounce webhook handler updates user state (Step 7)
  7. ✅ Complaint webhook handler updates user state (Step 7)
  8. ✅ Pre-prod DKIM/SPF/DMARC verification via mail-tester (out-of-CI; periodic) (Step 8)

Anti-patterns

Anti-patternWhy it failsFix
Test only "the send happened"Misses every content + link issueSteps 3 - 6
Skip plain-text alternativeMany corporate gateways strip HTML; bare HTML emails appear blankAlways assert both (Step 4)
Hardcode rewritten ESP linkTests fail when ESP rotates tracker domainsResolve to final URL (Step 5)
Skip unsubscribe testCompliance failure (CAN-SPAM, CASL, GDPR) + ISP penaltiesOne-click test (Step 6)
Skip bounce/complaint webhooksSender reputation degrades; deliverability dropsPer-ESP fixture tests (Step 7)

Limitations

  • This is a build-an-X workflow. Tests use the application's HTTP client + an SMTP capture tool (the host SKILL.md or mailhog-legacy.md).
  • DKIM / SPF / DMARC validation requires a real MTA; CI tests cover content + handler logic, not authentication-on-the-wire.
  • Per-ESP webhook payloads vary; test fixtures must come from each ESP's official docs.
  • Email rendering across clients (Outlook, Gmail, Apple Mail) isn't covered here - that's a pdf-print-render-adjacent domain (visual regression for email).

References

  • IETF RFC 2046 §5.1.4 - multipart/alternative
  • IETF RFC 8058 - Signaling One-Click Functionality for List-Unsubscribe Email Headers
  • IETF RFC 5321 - Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP)
  • IETF RFC 5322 - Internet Message Format
  • mail-tester.com - pre-prod deliverability scoring
  • dmarcian.com - DMARC monitoring
  • The host SKILL.md (Mailpit) + mailhog-legacy.md - SMTP capture partners
  • webhook-delivery-tester - companion: bounce/complaint webhook handlers receive vendor webhooks; same patterns
  • sms-test-author, push-notification-test-author - sister channels

SKILL.md

tile.json