CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

testland/manual-test-debrief

Session debrief template + tour-coverage tracker - captures the SBTM PROOF format (Past, Results, Obstacles, Outlook, Feelings) plus three-bucket time accounting (test design / setup / bug investigation), the tours applied + areas covered + areas skipped, and the per-session quality-of-attention signal. Output is the artifact a charter delivers into; the team aggregates debriefs across sessions to track what's been explored vs what's still uncharted. Use after every exploratory session - without the debrief, the session's findings disappear.

75

Quality

94%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, lean skill body that pairs a copy-paste template with concrete anti-patterns and cleanly offloads the long-form worked examples to a single real reference file. Little to improve.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Lean body that assumes Claude's competence - it does not explain what SBTM or PROOF is, gives a one-line attribution, and every section (template, anti-patterns, limitations) earns its place.

3 / 3

Actionability

Provides a complete, copy-paste-ready blank PROOF template with a 3-bucket time table, a concrete anti-pattern table mapping failure to fix, and a pointer to a fully worked example - directly executable guidance.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Two clearly sequenced steps (debrief within 30 min of session end, then aggregate) with an explicit timing gate and 'always fill Feelings' rule acting as checkpoints; no destructive/batch operations require validation loops here.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Body is an overview plus blank template; the worked example, quarterly rollup, and attention tracker are split into a single one-level-deep reference (references/debrief-examples.md, verified present) with clearly signaled links.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

85%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, specific description that covers both capability and trigger in third person. Its main weakness is jargon-heavy trigger phrasing that a non-expert user might not naturally utter.

Suggestions

Add plainer user-facing trigger phrasing alongside the jargon, e.g. 'Use when summarizing or debriefing an exploratory testing session, charter run, or bug bash'.

Spell out the SBTM/PROOF acronym once with a common term ('session-based test management debrief') so the trigger matches non-specialist phrasing.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions in third person - 'captures the SBTM PROOF format (Past, Results, Obstacles, Outlook, Feelings) plus three-bucket time accounting', 'tours applied + areas covered + areas skipped', and 'aggregates debriefs across sessions'.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers what ('Session debrief template + tour-coverage tracker ...') and when ('Use after every exploratory session'), satisfying both halves with an explicit trigger.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes some natural user terms ('exploratory session', 'debrief', 'charter') but leans heavily on jargon (SBTM, PROOF, three-bucket time accounting) rather than the common variations a user would actually say.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche (SBTM PROOF debriefs) with distinct triggers and explicit sibling-skill references, making it unlikely to fire for an unrelated skill.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Reviewed

Table of Contents