Builds stakeholder-readable scripted manual test cases from a feature spec in four formats: a step-table (preconditions / steps / expected result / actual / pass-fail / notes) for spreadsheet review, a Gherkin Given/When/Then format for BDD-aware teams, a business-language UAT script with acceptance-criteria mapping and contractual sign-off (references/uat-format.md), and a one-line-per-item execution checklist for smoke / on-call / bug-bash / compliance sweeps (references/checklist-format.md). Each script is self-contained (no implicit team knowledge), single-scenario (one happy + N edge per script), and includes the data setup the tester needs without being a developer. Use when a feature can't be (or shouldn't be) fully automated and a human tester needs an executable script or checklist - UAT sign-off rounds, regression baselines, certification testing, deploy smoke checklists, exploratory follow-up scripts.
94
88%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
95%
0.98xAverage score across 10 eval scenarios
High
Do not use without reviewing
Deliverable exists at the named path
100%
100%
The ambiguous date of birth is surfaced, not silently read
100%
76%
The expected premium is not asserted against an unconfirmed pricing table
100%
95%
Unsettled points listed as questions with owners
100%
100%
Every field the tester types is specified
100%
100%
Repeat runs within a day are handled
100%
100%
Each step has one observable result
100%
93%
Failure capture and the quote reference recorded
100%
100%
Deliverable exists at the named path
100%
100%
Case is anchored to an account whose limit is actually published
100%
100%
Exact amounts with currency, positioned against the published threshold
100%
100%
The undefined Youth limit is raised, not invented
100%
100%
Cumulative counter handled so the case can be re-run the same day
100%
100%
Step-up passcode is part of the procedure
100%
100%
Reset boundary stated in an unambiguous timezone
100%
100%
Every step has one observable result, plus failure capture
100%
100%
Deliverable exists at the named path
100%
100%
One behaviour per scenario
100%
100%
Shared setup replaces 'the warehouse is set up'
100%
100%
The scan order is spelled out
100%
100%
Then steps assert the handheld or console text with figures
100%
91%
Purchase orders allocated so the pool survives
100%
100%
Supervisor override covered where it is required
100%
100%
Failure capture
100%
100%
Deliverable exists at the named path
100%
100%
Split into separately runnable parts, one behaviour each
100%
100%
No part depends on another having been run
100%
62%
Each part names its employee and its expected figures
100%
90%
Repeatability of the consumable pay period is handled
100%
100%
Approver login accounted for where a run is committed
100%
100%
Index table with identifiers, coverage and run time
100%
100%
Failure capture
100%
100%
Deliverable exists at the named path
100%
100%
Every step carries a device-observable outcome
89%
92%
A specific unconsumed activation code is named
100%
100%
The pool is left usable for the next tester
100%
100%
Handset, OS and app build pinned to a device that can run it
100%
100%
Wi-Fi state stated per phase, in the right direction
100%
100%
Failure record an engineer can reproduce from
100%
100%
Deliverable exists at the named path
100%
100%
Starts from a named seeded booking, not an inherited one
100%
100%
Fare choice is pinned and justified
100%
100%
Payment step present with usable card details
100%
100%
Exact from-seat and to-seat, both actually available
100%
100%
The environment is left able to run the case again
100%
100%
Each step has one observable result
100%
100%
Failure capture
75%
100%
Deliverable exists at the named path
100%
100%
Login and order are pinned to real seeded values
100%
100%
Refund amount is an exact figure with its currency stated
100%
100%
Every action carries one observable expected result
100%
100%
Unsettled points raised as questions instead of decided
100%
100%
Second run the same afternoon is accounted for
62%
100%
Email verification is executable
80%
100%
Failure capture block present
100%
100%
Deliverable exists at the named path
100%
100%
Expected counts computed from the file
100%
100%
The two risky rows are the ones inspected, with exact expected values
100%
100%
Second run produces the same result as the first
100%
100%
Tenant and login are pinned to ones that work
100%
100%
The upload configuration is stated
100%
100%
Each step has one observable result
100%
100%
Failure capture
100%
100%
Deliverable exists at the named path
100%
100%
Cut to something that fits the window
0%
0%
The entry that cannot be done at deploy time is removed and said so
100%
100%
Every entry names a specific thing that tells the engineer it is fine
83%
91%
Time allowance per section and for the run
100%
100%
A completed run identifies which deploy it was
100%
100%
Correct account and merchant scoping
100%
100%
Failure capture and stated non-coverage
100%
100%
Deliverable exists at the named path
100%
100%
No step requires technical access or vocabulary
100%
100%
Each contractual item is mapped to the actions that demonstrate it
100%
100%
Session setup names the exact patient, ward, accounts and release
100%
100%
The rejection case is out of this run
100%
100%
Every action states an outcome the signer can judge
100%
100%
Written confirmation section fit for the contract
100%
100%
Failure capture during the session
75%
100%
Table of Contents