Assigns an ML model to a low, medium, or high risk tier from what its predictions decide about people, then derives the fairness and explainability evidence that tier must produce: group metrics per declared sensitive feature, intersectional breakdowns with per-cell counts, vulnerability scan categories, a drift monitoring plan, and per-prediction explanation logs. Supplies conventional demographic parity difference bands, a per-vulnerability-category blocking table, evidence rules marking a bundle incomplete or self-contradicting, and a fairness gating workflow that walks a candidate's model card + evidence bundle to a promote / needs-work / block verdict with refuse rules; a reference covers producing the explanation records with Alibi Explain. Use when a model release candidate is up for promotion and someone must decide which fairness artifacts are mandatory, when a declared risk tier's evidence bundle must be checked against what the tier demands, or when the evidence review must gate the promotion.
72
91%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Low
Low-risk findings.
1 low severity finding. Worth noting, but not necessarily harmful.
The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.
SKILL.md’s Step 9 fairness-gating workflow ingests a release candidate’s model card and evidence bundle (including sensitive-feature lists, fairness metrics/DPD values, drift monitoring claims, vulnerability scan JSON, and per-prediction explanation logs) that a provider user authors, so outsider free text/JSON fields are directly read and evaluated at runtime.
user-provided model card + evidence bundle (model_card.json, fairness numbers, vulnerability scan JSON, drift monitoring plan, explanation logs)
content-type · 11 sites
Step 9 instructs the agent to read and evaluate a release candidate's model card and evidence bundle provided by the user as local files; no external fetching occurs, but the model provider could be a different organizational party from the reviewer.