Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, mostly copy-paste-ready reference for incident metrics with concrete schema, formulae, dashboards, and a worked example. Its main gap is implicit rather than explicit validation checkpoints in the workflow.
Suggestions
Add an explicit verification checkpoint in 'How to use' — e.g., after computing metrics, validate each incident passes the Step 3 exclusion filter and that timestamps are distinct before accepting the window.
Replace the MTBF Grafana placeholder ('... (your time-series store DSL)') with a concrete example expr or a clearly justified note on why it is store-specific.
Tighten acronym/term expansions like 'ITIL 4 (Information Technology Infrastructure Library)' since the target audience already knows these.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with concrete artifacts (JSON schema, formulae, Grafana/Prometheus YAML, tables) and minimal prose; it assumes SRE/ITIL competence rather than explaining basics, so most tokens earn their place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides a copy-paste-ready incident schema, explicit formulae, a Grafana panel fragment, a Prometheus alert rule, and a fully worked numeric example; the only placeholder (MTBF expr) is explicitly flagged as store-dependent. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'How to use' section gives a clear 7-step sequence, but validation/checkpoint steps are implicit rather than explicit (no validate-then-proceed or retry loops), so it sits below the explicit-checkpoint anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single self-contained reference with well-organized sections (When/How to use, Steps 1-8, Worked example, Anti-patterns, Limitations, References) and only one-level-deep external references (Google SRE URL), with no nested file indirection. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |