CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

testland/pact-contract-testing

Authors and verifies Pact consumer-driven contract tests across the full Pact lifecycle - consumer tests producing pact files, publishing to the Pact Broker, provider verification, and `can-i-deploy` deployment gates. Use when introducing a new HTTP/JSON API contract between two services, diagnosing breaking changes, or wiring contract verification into CI.

75

Quality

94%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files
name:
pact-contract-testing
description:
Authors and verifies Pact consumer-driven contract tests across the full Pact lifecycle - consumer tests producing pact files, publishing to the Pact Broker, provider verification, and `can-i-deploy` deployment gates. Use when introducing a new HTTP/JSON API contract between two services, diagnosing breaking changes, or wiring contract verification into CI.

pact-contract-testing

Overview

Pact is a code-first tool for consumer-driven contract tests over HTTP and message integrations (pact-overview). The contract is a side-effect of the consumer's tests - each test documents one request/response pair, and only the parts the consumer actually uses get tested.

The lifecycle has five steps (pact-how-it-works):

  1. Consumer test runs against a Pact mock server using the Pact DSL.
  2. The framework writes a pact file (JSON) capturing every given() → uponReceiving() → withRequest() → willRespondWith() interaction.
  3. The pact file is published to the Pact Broker.
  4. The provider verifies the pact: each recorded request is replayed against the running provider and responses are checked against the contract.
  5. can-i-deploy queries the Broker matrix to confirm the candidate version has a green verification against every consumer/provider already deployed in the target environment (can-i-deploy).

When to use

  • Two or more services communicate over HTTP/JSON or a message bus.
  • The team owns both consumer and provider - Pact requires provider buy-in for verification.
  • You want a safety net richer than schema comparison: contract-by-example asserts what consumers actually use, not the full provider surface.
  • The repo already imports @pact-foundation/pact, pact-jvm-consumer, pact-python, etc., or a .pact/ directory is present.

If the API has no consumers under your control (public or third-party APIs), prefer openapi-contract-diff - schema diffs need no consumer coordination.

Authoring (consumer side)

Install (Node example)

npm install --save-dev @pact-foundation/pact

(Per pact-js.)

Consumer test with PactV3

const { PactV3, MatchersV3 } = require('@pact-foundation/pact');
const { like, eachLike } = MatchersV3;

const provider = new PactV3({
  consumer: 'web-app',
  provider: 'pet-service',
  dir: path.resolve(process.cwd(), 'pacts'),
});

describe('Pet Service consumer', () => {
  it('returns a list of dogs', async () => {
    provider
      .given('I have a list of dogs')
      .uponReceiving('a request for all dogs with the builder pattern')
      .withRequest({
        method: 'GET',
        path: '/dogs',
        headers: { Accept: 'application/json' },
      })
      .willRespondWith({
        status: 200,
        headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' },
        body: eachLike({
          id: like(1),
          name: like('Rex'),
        }),
      });

    await provider.executeTest(async (mockServer) => {
      const response = await fetch(`${mockServer.url}/dogs`);
      expect(response.status).toBe(200);
    });
  });
});

(Adapted from pact-js.)

given() describes a provider state the verifier sets up later. Matchers like like() and eachLike() assert type/shape rather than exact values, so the provider isn't bound to fixture-specific data.

Where pact files are written

By default, PactV3 writes pact files to ./pacts/ relative to the process CWD (pact-js). Each consumer/provider pair produces one JSON file: <consumer>-<provider>.json.

Publishing to the Pact Broker

The Broker is the central registry for pact files and verification results. Publishing happens after the consumer tests pass:

npx pact-broker publish ./pacts \
  --consumer-app-version=$(git rev-parse HEAD) \
  --branch=$(git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD) \
  --broker-base-url=$PACT_BROKER_BASE_URL \
  --broker-token=$PACT_BROKER_TOKEN

The Broker stores (overview):

  • The pact files themselves.
  • Provider verification results per consumer version.
  • Tags and branches that map app versions to lifecycle environments (e.g. production, staging, main).

Tagging by branch + the Git SHA as consumer-app-version is the canonical pattern - can-i-deploy queries the matrix using these identifiers.

Provider verification

const { Verifier } = require('@pact-foundation/pact');

new Verifier({
  providerBaseUrl: 'http://localhost:8081',
  pactBrokerUrl: process.env.PACT_BROKER_BASE_URL,
  pactBrokerToken: process.env.PACT_BROKER_TOKEN,
  provider: 'pet-service',
  providerVersion: process.env.GIT_SHA,
  providerVersionBranch: process.env.GIT_BRANCH,
  publishVerificationResult: true,
  consumerVersionSelectors: [
    { mainBranch: true },
    { deployedOrReleased: true },
  ],
}).verifyProvider();

(Adapted from pact-js.)

consumerVersionSelectors controls which consumer pacts get verified - mainBranch plus deployedOrReleased keeps the provider compatible with both the latest consumer work and what's in production (pact-how-it-works). publishVerificationResult: true is what updates the matrix - without it the broker has no record of this provider version's verification status.

Provider states

For each consumer interaction with a given(<state>), the provider test setup must register a hook that puts the system into that state before replay. Using Express:

new Verifier({
  ...
  stateHandlers: {
    'I have a list of dogs': async () => {
      await db.dogs.bulkInsert([{ id: 1, name: 'Rex' }]);
      return { description: 'dogs seeded' };
    },
  },
}).verifyProvider();

State setup that fails causes the matching interaction to fail verification.

can-i-deploy - deployment gate

Per can-i-deploy:

pact-broker can-i-deploy \
  --pacticipant pet-service \
  --version $(git rev-parse HEAD) \
  --to-environment production
FlagRequiredEffect
--pacticipantyesApplication (consumer or provider) name.
--versionyesApp version string (typically the Git SHA).
--to-environmentoptionalTarget environment to check against. Omit to check against latest.

Exit codes (can-i-deploy):

  • 0 - "Computer says yes \o/" - safe to deploy.
  • 1 - "Computer says no" - at least one matrix cell is missing or failed.

The output includes a markdown-style matrix of consumer/provider version pairs with verification status and links to detailed verification results.

Recording deployments

After deploying, record the deployment so subsequent can-i-deploy queries see the new "currently deployed" baseline:

pact-broker record-deployment \
  --pacticipant pet-service \
  --version $(git rev-parse HEAD) \
  --environment production

Skipping this step is the most common reason can-i-deploy returns spurious "no" verdicts.

CI integration

Wire publish -> verify -> can-i-deploy into the pipeline for both sides. Full consumer and provider GitHub Actions steps are in references/ci-pipelines.md.

can-i-deploy is the actual gate - pact verification happens in step 1, but a green verification alone doesn't prove every paired version is compatible.

References

Workspace
testland
Visibility
Public
Created
Last updated
Publish Source
GitHub
Badge
testland/pact-contract-testing badge