Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is well-structured, actionable, and uses progressive disclosure effectively with a real reference file. The main gap is missing validation checkpoints in the workflow for a batch aggregation, plus a worked example that diverges slightly from the stated decision rule.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation checkpoint in the How-to-use workflow (e.g. 'verify each runner artifact exists and parsed before applying the gate; fail fast with a clear error if a required artifact or the main baseline is missing').
Reconcile the worked example with the decision rule: have run_perf_gate.py compute delta_pct against a fetched baseline and apply the regression/warn thresholds, rather than only blocking on status==fail.
Collapse the duplicated gate logic so the worked example imports or mirrors gate_decision rather than re-implementing a simpler variant.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean and assumes Claude's competence (no padding about what k6 or Lighthouse are), but the gate logic is implemented twice — conceptually in gate_decision and again in the worked example — which could be tightened. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides executable code (run_perf_gate.py), a concrete metric-record schema, and a markdown artifact template, but the worked example omits delta_pct regression handling and baseline fetching that the stated decision rule requires, leaving a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The five-step How-to-use sequence is clearly ordered with an explicit non-zero exit on no-go, but the workflow lacks validation checkpoints (e.g. confirm each artifact exists/parsed, baseline present) for a batch aggregation across multiple runners, which caps this dimension. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a well-signaled overview that defers deep material (per-runner source map, full CI wiring, per-metric budgets) to a real one-level-deep reference, references/ci-wiring-and-metric-sources.md, linked clearly and verified to exist. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |