testland/performance-feedback-author
Build-an-X workflow that drafts evidence-based performance feedback and review input for testers using the Center for Creative Leadership's SBI model (Situation - Behavior - Impact, extended to SBII with Intent) - pulling every Behavior statement from verifiable work artifacts (bug reports authored, test cases and automation merged, review comments, charter session logs) rather than impressions or adjectives. Produces the written feedback artifact itself - not the agenda for the recurring conversation where it is delivered, not a team capability map (kept deliberately separate from performance data), and not a scorecard for external candidates. Use when a QA manager owes someone specific feedback this week, or when writing review input or a promotion case for review season.
74
93%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Low
Low-risk findings.
1 low severity finding. Worth noting, but not necessarily harmful.
W011: Third-party content exposure detected (indirect prompt injection risk).
What this means
The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.
Why it was flagged
SKILL.md’s workflow explicitly calls for mining “bug reports authored… review comments… charter session logs” from external work artifacts (e.g., bug tracker/review system content authored by others), which would be ingested into the LLM context when formulating the Behavior statements.
- Audited
- Security analysis