Runs PMD's built-in Apex security ruleset (`category/apex/security.xml`) against Salesforce Apex source to detect injection, privilege-escalation, cryptographic, and XSS vulnerabilities; configures custom rulesets for regulated-industry Apex codebases; emits SARIF for GitHub Code Scanning upload; integrates `pmd check` as a PR-blocking CI gate. Use when the codebase contains Salesforce Apex and the team needs SAST coverage for ApexSOQLInjection, ApexCRUDViolation, ApexSharingViolations, or the full 10-rule security category.
79
99%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Per pmd.github.io - Apex Security Rules:
PMD ships a built-in category/apex/security.xml ruleset that covers 10
security rules for Salesforce Apex. All 10 rules are present since PMD 5.5.3
and carry Medium (3) priority by default. The ruleset addresses the
Salesforce-specific threat model: SOQL injection, object/field-level security
bypass, sharing-model evasion, hard-coded credentials, insecure endpoints,
XSS through Visualforce, and open redirect.
This skill is the Apex-specific companion to
semgrep-rules and
sonarqube-rules. Those tools cover general
multi-language patterns; this one covers the Salesforce Apex security category
absent from both. Findings from all five SAST tools can be unified in a
multi-scanner triage step.
.cls, .trigger) and requires SAST
gating in CI.Per pmd.github.io - Installation, PMD requires Java 8 or later.
Download the zip from the GitHub releases page, unzip, and add
bin/ to PATH:
# Linux / macOS
unzip pmd-dist-*.zip -d ~/pmd
export PATH="$HOME/pmd/bin:$PATH"
# Verify
pmd --versionFor CI, prefer the Docker image or the Maven/Gradle plugin to avoid zip
management. The Docker image is available at ghcr.io/pmd/pmd.
Per pmd.github.io - CLI Reference:
pmd check -d . -R category/apex/security.xml -f sarif -r pmd-apex.sarifFlag reference (per pmd-cli):
| Flag | Meaning |
|---|---|
-d <path> | Source directory or file to analyze |
-R <refs> | Ruleset path; comma-separated for multiple |
-f <format> | Output format (sarif, text, xml, json, html; default: text) |
-r <file> | Write report to file instead of stdout |
--minimum-priority <n> | Skip rules below priority n (1=High, 5=Info) |
--cache <file> | Enable incremental analysis (per pmd-cache) |
Exit codes (per pmd-cli):
| Code | Meaning |
|---|---|
| 0 | Success, no violations |
| 1 | Unhandled exception |
| 2 | Invalid arguments |
| 4 | Violations detected |
| 5 | Recoverable parsing errors |
The category/apex/security.xml ruleset ships 10 rules. The headline
three are ApexSOQLInjection (dynamic SOQL built from untrusted input),
ApexCRUDViolation (missing object/field permission check before
SOQL/SOSL/DML), and ApexSharingViolations (DML without an explicit
sharing keyword). The full 10-rule table and per-rule
compliant/non-compliant examples are in
references/apex-security-rules.md,
per pmd-apex-sec.
Per pmd.github.io - Making Rulesets:
Use a custom XML ruleset to select a subset, override priorities, or add exclusion patterns for generated code:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<ruleset name="Apex Security - Regulated"
xmlns="http://pmd.sourceforge.net/ruleset/2.0.0"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://pmd.sourceforge.net/ruleset/2.0.0
https://pmd.sourceforge.io/ruleset_2_0_0.xsd">
<description>Apex security rules for regulated-industry Apex</description>
<!-- Include the full security category -->
<rule ref="category/apex/security.xml">
<!-- Suppress for auto-generated WSDL stubs -->
<exclude name="ApexSuggestUsingNamedCred"/>
</rule>
<!-- Exclude generated code directories -->
<exclude-pattern>.*/generated/.*</exclude-pattern>
</ruleset>Run with the custom ruleset:
pmd check -d force-app/main/default/classes \
-R config/pmd-apex-regulated.xml \
-f sarif \
-r pmd-apex.sarifPer pmd-rulesets, referencing an entire category means the ruleset automatically picks up new rules added to that category in future PMD versions. Pin specific versions in CI to avoid unexpected gate changes.
Per pmd-cache (PMD 5.6.0+):
pmd check -d force-app/main/default/classes \
-R category/apex/security.xml \
-f sarif \
-r pmd-apex.sarif \
--cache .pmd-cache/apex.cacheThe cache stores file checksums. Unchanged files reuse cached results; only modified files are re-analyzed. The generated report is identical to a full run (per pmd-cache). Cache is invalidated automatically on PMD version change, ruleset modification, or auxclasspath change.
jobs:
pmd-apex:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Download PMD
run: |
PMD_VERSION=7.7.0
curl -Lo pmd.zip \
https://github.com/pmd/pmd/releases/download/pmd_releases%2F${PMD_VERSION}/pmd-dist-${PMD_VERSION}-bin.zip
unzip -q pmd.zip -d pmd-dist
echo "$PWD/pmd-dist/pmd-bin-${PMD_VERSION}/bin" >> $GITHUB_PATH
- name: Run PMD Apex security scan
run: |
pmd check \
-d force-app/main/default/classes \
-R category/apex/security.xml \
-f sarif \
-r pmd-apex.sarif \
--cache .pmd-cache/apex.cache
# Exit code 4 = violations found (per pmd-cli); gate blocks on non-zero
continue-on-error: false
- name: Upload SARIF to GitHub Code Scanning
uses: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v3
if: always()
with:
sarif_file: pmd-apex.sarif
category: pmd-apexPer pmd-cli, exit code 4 means violations detected. continue-on-error: false blocks the PR on any finding. Use --minimum-priority 2 to gate only on High and Critical findings while still uploading all findings via SARIF.
PMD suppression in Apex (per pmd-apex-sec): annotate the
method or class with @SuppressWarnings:
@SuppressWarnings('PMD.ApexCRUDViolation')
public class VisualforceGetter {
// Visualforce getters auto-enforce FLS; CRUD check is redundant here
public List<Account> getAccounts() {
return [SELECT Id, Name FROM Account];
}
}Add a comment explaining the justification. Suppressions without rationale are flagged in code review.
| Anti-pattern | Why it fails | Fix |
|---|---|---|
Running against all directories including classes/test | Test classes generate false positives for CRUD/sharing | Exclude test directories with <exclude-pattern> |
No --cache in CI on large orgs | Full re-scan of 500+ classes on every commit is slow | Add --cache .pmd-cache/apex.cache (Step 5) |
Suppressing ApexSOQLInjection globally | Masks real injection risks | Suppress per method with a written justification only |
Floating latest PMD version in CI | Gate breaks when a new rule fires unexpectedly | Pin the PMD_VERSION variable |
Custom auth facade without *AuthMethodPattern config | All CRUD-checked methods still flagged as violations | Configure createAuthMethodPattern etc. per pmd-apex-sec |
codeql-queries.ApexCRUDViolation generates false positives on Visualforce getter methods
where FLS is enforced automatically; suppress with justification per Step 7..js); client-side XSS is out
of scope. Use semgrep-rules with the
p/owasp-top-ten ruleset for LWC JavaScript.-f format options including sarifsemgrep-rules - multi-language pattern SASTcodeql-queries - interprocedural / data-flow SASTsonarqube-rules - semantic-DB SAST