Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is lean, concrete, and well-structured with executable templates and clear sequencing including review/feedback checkpoints. It assumes Claude's intelligence and avoids explaining basic concepts.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body assumes Claude's competence (no pedantic definitions of risk or ISO), and every table and template earns its place, though the repeated 'cite by stable ID; ISO behind paywall' phrasing is mildly redundant. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste Markdown register templates, a concrete impact×likelihood scoring tier table, populated example rows (PR-001…PR-004), and named composable skills (risk-matrix, risk-coverage-mapper) with specific actions like 'Copy product risks scoring ≥10'. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear six-step sequence with explicit feedback loops: Step 4 links mitigations to coverage (or flags gaps) and Step 5 quarterly review re-scores, retires, and raises/lowers risks with a worked review log. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist; the skill is self-contained yet well-organized into Overview, When to use, six numbered steps, worked example, anti-patterns, limitations, and references — appropriate for a no-external-reference skill per the rubric notes. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |