Lean and efficient throughout - tables and code fences carry dense information without padding; it assumes Claude's competence rather than re-explaining basic risk concepts. It is not the verbose, concept-explaining pattern of the score-1 anchor.

Provides fully concrete, copy-paste-ready guidance: anchored 1-5 impact/likelihood scales, a ready-to-fill register table with real worked rows, named mitigation strategies, and a weekly-review template. Matches the executable/specific examples anchor.

A clear six-step sequence (Identify → Score → Mitigate → Document → Review → Escalate) with explicit validation checkpoints - the score ≥15 escalation trigger and weekly review cadence act as feedback loops that catch drift early.

Single-file skill with no bundle references present; content is well-organized into clearly signaled sections (Overview, When to use, Steps, Anti-patterns, Limitations, References). Per the simple-skills note, well-organized single-file content scores 3.

Lists multiple concrete actions - 'ISO 31000-aligned identification, impact × likelihood scoring, mitigation strategy (avoid / mitigate / transfer / accept), and ownership' - matching the top anchor of multiple specific concrete actions.

Explicitly answers both what it does ('Build-an-X workflow producing a project-level risk register') and when to use ('Use for release-execution risk'), plus when not to use via sibling redirects.

Strong natural-language coverage - 'project risk register', 'schedule slippage', 'scope creep', 'vendor / dependency', 'release-execution risk' - terms a user would actually say when needing this skill.

Clearly separates project-execution risk from product risk and names three sibling skills (product-risk-register-builder, risk-matrix, risk-acceptance-decision-author) with their distinct scopes, making wrong-skill triggering unlikely.